Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz SLK (R171) AMG SLK 55 V8vsWiesmann Roadster 3.2i 24V

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz SLK (R171)

AMG SLK 55 V8

360 hp5439 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedRoadster2004-2007
VS

Wiesmann Roadster

3.2i 24V

321 hp3201 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedRoadster1993-2005

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz SLK (R171) AMG SLK 55 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    270 km/h
    168 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    360 hp
    268 kW
  • Highest torque
    510 Nm
    376 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    583 km
    362 mi
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    74/100

Wiesmann Roadster 3.2i 24V

  • Lightest
    1,060 kg
    2,337 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    303 hp/t
    226 kW/t
    3.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.0 L/100 km
    21.4 mpg US
    25.7 mpg UK
  • Best economy score
    77/100
  • Best practicality score
    30/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzSLK (R171)AMG SLK 55 V8WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V
Power
360hp268kW
321hp239kW
Torque
510Nm376lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,465kg3,230lb
1,060kg2,337lb
Gross weight
1,850kg4,079lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
255 km/h
158 mph
To 99% top speed
61.3s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph
Calculated
49.7s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.9s
4.9s
0-200 km/h
15.9s
Calculated
15.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.7s
Calculated
4.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK
11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
17.7L/100 km13.3mpg US16.0mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
12.9s
Calculated
12.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
246hp/t183kW/t111hp/1000 lb
Calculated
303hp/t226kW/t137hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
348Nm/t233lb-ft/ton
Calculated
330Nm/t221lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
583km362mi
Calculated
545km339mi
Calculated
Displacement
5,439cc332cu in
3,201cc195cu in
Length
4,087mm161in
3,860mm152in
Width
1,794mm71in
1,750mm69in
Height
1,271mm50in
1,160mm46in
Wheelbase
2,430mm96in
2,450mm96in
Front track
1,524mm60in
1,450mm57in
Rear track
1,549mm61in
1,520mm60in
Trunk volume
208L
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
70L
60L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz SLK (R171) AMG SLK 55 V8Wiesmann Roadster 3.2i 24VPowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz SLK (R171) AMG SLK 55 V8: Power / Torque
  • Wiesmann Roadster 3.2i 24V: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)AMG SLK 55 V85,750 rpm4,000 rpm6,000 rpm
WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V7,400 rpm3,250 rpm7,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzSLK (R171)AMG SLK 55 V8WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.7 s
4.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.9 s
4.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
15.9 s
15.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
255 km/h
158 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
5.7 s
5.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.5 s
8.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.9 s
10.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.9 s
12.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
182 km/h
113 mph
183 km/h
114 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)AMG SLK 55 V8
360 hp
268 kW
WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V
321 hp
239 kW

Mercedes-Benz SLK (R171) AMG SLK 55 V8 has 39 hp more than Wiesmann Roadster 3.2i 24V.

The biggest power difference is between Wiesmann Roadster 3.2i 24V and Mercedes-Benz SLK (R171) AMG SLK 55 V8: 39 hp (29 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)AMG SLK 55 V8
510 Nm
376 lb-ft
WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)AMG SLK 55 V8
1,465 kg
3,230 lb
WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V
1,060 kg
2,337 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)AMG SLK 55 V8
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V
255 km/h
158 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)AMG SLK 55 V84.9 s
WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V4.9 s

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)AMG SLK 55 V8
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V
11.0 L/100 km
21.4 mpg US
25.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Wiesmann Roadster 3.2i 24V and Mercedes-Benz SLK (R171) AMG SLK 55 V8: 1.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)AMG SLK 55 V8
246 hp/t
183 kW/t
4.1 kg/hp
WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V
303 hp/t
226 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)AMG SLK 55 V8
583 km
362 mi
WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V
545 km
339 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)AMG SLK 55 V8
360 hp
268 kW
4.9 s
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V
321 hp
239 kW
4.9 s
255 km/h
158 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)AMG SLK 55 V8
Power
360 hp
268 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
208 L
7.3 cu ft
Length
4,087 mm
160.9 in
Height
1,271 mm
50.0 in
WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V
Power
321 hp
239 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
255 km/h
158 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
3,860 mm
152.0 in
Height
1,160 mm
45.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)AMG SLK 55 V8
Power
360 hp
268 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V
Power
321 hp
239 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
255 km/h
158 mph
11.0 L/100 km
21.4 mpg US
25.7 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz SLK (R171) AMG SLK 55 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)AMG SLK 55 V8
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
4.9 s
WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V
11.0 L/100 km
21.4 mpg US
25.7 mpg UK
4.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)AMG SLK 55 V8
246 hp/t
183 kW/t
4.1 kg/hp
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V
303 hp/t
226 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
11.0 L/100 km
21.4 mpg US
25.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzSLK (R171)AMG SLK 55 V8WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V
Power
360 hp
268 kW
321 hp
239 kW
Torque
510 Nm
376 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.9 s
4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
255 km/h
158 mph
Lightness
1,465 kg
3,230 lb
1,060 kg
2,337 lb
Fuel consumption
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
11.0 L/100 km
21.4 mpg US
25.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
208 L
7.3 cu ft
Length
4,087 mm
160.9 in
Height
1,271 mm
50.0 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
3,860 mm
152.0 in
Height
1,160 mm
45.7 in
Range score
583 km
362 mi
545 km
339 mi
Trunk score
208 L
7.3 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
246 hp/t
183 kW/t
4.1 kg/hp
303 hp/t
226 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz SLK (R171) AMG SLK 55 V8Wiesmann Roadster 3.2i 24V
Consumption12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km21.00 LC100 km19.25 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi33.80 LC100 mi30.98 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,150 LC/year2,888 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz SLK (R171) AMG SLK 55 V8

  • Has 39 hp more
  • Has 160 Nm more
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 38 km (24 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Wiesmann Roadster 3.2i 24V

  • Is 405 kg lighter
  • Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 57 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R171) AMG SLK 55 V8
Wiesmann Roadster 3.2i 24V
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

AMG SLK 55 V8
AMG SLK 32 V6
VS
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)AMG SLK 55 V8vsMercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6
3.2i 24V
3.2
VS
WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24VvsBMWZ3 M (E36/7)3.2
AMG SLK 55 V8
AMG SLK 55 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)AMG SLK 55 V8vsMercedes-BenzSLK (R171)Facelift 2008AMG SLK 55 V8
3.2i 24V
5.7 i V8 16V
VS
WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24VvsChevroletCorvette Convertible (C5)5.7 i V8 16V
AMG SLK 55 V8
AMG SLK 55 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)AMG SLK 55 V8vsMercedes-BenzSLK (R172)AMG SLK 55 V8
AMG SLK 55 V8
SLK 230 Kompressor
VS
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)AMG SLK 55 V8vsMercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor
3.2i 24V
SL 500 V8
VS
WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24VvsMercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 500 V8
AMG SLK 55 V8
AMG SL 55 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)AMG SLK 55 V8vsMercedes-BenzSL (R230)AMG SL 55 V8
3.2i 24V
3.4 V8
VS
WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24VvsFerrari348 Spider3.4 V8
AMG SLK 55 V8
SL 600 V12
VS
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)AMG SLK 55 V8vsMercedes-BenzSL (R230)Facelift 2006SL 600 V12
3.2i 24V
S 3.2
VS
WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24VvsPorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2
3.2i 24V
5.7 V8
VS
WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24VvsChevroletCorvette Convertible (C4)Facelift 19905.7 V8
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R171) AMG SLK 55 V8 vs Wiesmann Roadster 3.2i 24V - car comparison - FastVsFaster