Wiesmann Roadster
Car comparison
Wiesmann Roadster 3.2i 24VvsChevrolet Corvette Convertible (C4) · Facelift 1990 5.7 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonChevrolet Corvette Convertible (C4) · Facelift 1990
5.7 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Wiesmann Roadster 3.2i 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed255 km/h158 mph
- Most powerful321 hp239 kW
- Lightest1,060 kg2,337 lb
- Best power-to-weight303 hp/t226 kW/t3.3 kg/hp
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score69/100
- Best economy score77/100
- Best practicality score30/100
Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C4) Facelift 1990 5.7 V8
- Highest torque437 Nm322 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V | ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C4)Facelift 19905.7 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 321hp239kW | 281hp210kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 437Nm322lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,060kg2,337lb | 1,620kg3,571lb |
| Top speed | 255 km/h 158 mph | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 49.7s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated | 66.1s99% target: 251 km/h / 156 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.8s Calculated | 19.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 16.7L/100 km14.1mpg US16.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.9s Calculated | 13.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 303hp/t226kW/t137hp/1000 lb Calculated | 173hp/t129kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 330Nm/t221lb-ft/ton Calculated | 270Nm/t180lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 545km339mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,201cc195cu in | 5,733cc350cu in |
| Length | 3,860mm152in | 4,535mm179in |
| Width | 1,750mm69in | 1,796mm71in |
| Height | 1,160mm46in | 1,177mm46in |
| Wheelbase | 2,450mm96in | 2,444mm96in |
| Front track | 1,450mm57in | 1,466mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,520mm60in | 1,500mm59in |
| Trunk volume | - | 187L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 76L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Wiesmann Roadster 3.2i 24V: Power / Torque
- Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C4) Facelift 1990 5.7 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V | 7,400 rpm | 3,250 rpm | 7,650 rpm |
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C4)Facelift 19905.7 V8 | 5,200 rpm | 2,400 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V | ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C4)Facelift 19905.7 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.8 s | 19.1 s |
| Top speed | 255 km/h 158 mph | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 11.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.9 s | 13.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 183 km/h 114 mph | 172 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V | 321 hp 239 kW |
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C4)Facelift 19905.7 V8 | 281 hp 210 kW |
Wiesmann Roadster 3.2i 24V has 40 hp more than Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C4) Facelift 1990 5.7 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C4) Facelift 1990 5.7 V8 and Wiesmann Roadster 3.2i 24V: 40 hp (30 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C4)Facelift 19905.7 V8 | 437 Nm 322 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V | 1,060 kg 2,337 lb |
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C4)Facelift 19905.7 V8 | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C4)Facelift 19905.7 V8 | 254 km/h 158 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V | 4.9 s |
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C4)Facelift 19905.7 V8 | 5.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Wiesmann Roadster 3.2i 24V and Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C4) Facelift 1990 5.7 V8: 0.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V | 303 hp/t 226 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C4)Facelift 19905.7 V8 | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V | 321 hp 239 kW | 4.9 s | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C4)Facelift 19905.7 V8 | 281 hp 210 kW | 5.3 s | 254 km/h 158 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C4)Facelift 19905.7 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V | ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C4)Facelift 19905.7 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 321 hp 239 kW | 281 hp 210 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 437 Nm 322 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 255 km/h 158 mph | 254 km/h 158 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,060 kg 2,337 lb | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 545 km 339 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 187 L 6.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 303 hp/t 226 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Wiesmann Roadster 3.2i 24V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.98 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,888 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Wiesmann Roadster 3.2i 24V
- Has 40 hp more
- Is 560 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 129 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C4) Facelift 1990 5.7 V8
- Has 87 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























