Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) · Facelift 2000
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) · Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6vsMercedes-Benz SL (R129) · Facelift 1995 SL 600 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz SL (R129) · Facelift 1995
SL 600 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.2 s
- Fastest top speed270 km/h168 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,420 kg3,131 lb
- Best power-to-weight249 hp/t186 kW/t4.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.2 L/100 km21.0 mpg US25.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption16.2 L/100 km14.5 mpg US17.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Best performance score71/100
- Best economy score77/100
Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 SL 600 V12
- Most powerful394 hp294 kW
- Highest torque570 Nm420 lb-ft
- Best estimated range714 km444 mi
- Largest trunk265 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best practicality score31/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 600 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 354hp264kW | 394hp294kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 570Nm420lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,420kg3,131lb | 1,975kg4,354lb |
| Gross weight | 1,755kg3,869lb | 2,320kg5,115lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 64.2s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph Calculated | 86.1s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.2s | 6.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.8s Calculated | 20.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0s Calculated | 5.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.2L/100 km14.5mpg US17.4mpg UK | 19.8L/100 km11.9mpg US14.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.2s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 249hp/t186kW/t113hp/1000 lb Calculated | 199hp/t149kW/t90hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 317Nm/t212lb-ft/ton Calculated | 289Nm/t193lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 536km333mi Calculated | 714km444mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,199cc195cu in | 5,987cc365cu in |
| Length | 4,010mm158in | 4,499mm177in |
| Width | 1,715mm68in | 1,812mm71in |
| Height | 1,269mm50in | 1,296mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,400mm94in | 2,515mm99in |
| Front track | 1,488mm59in | 1,532mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,477mm58in | 1,521mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 145L | 265L |
| Max trunk volume | 348L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 80L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 SL 600 V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | 6,100 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 600 V12 | 5,200 rpm | 3,800 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 600 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.0 s | 5.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.2 s | 6.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.8 s | 20.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.7 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.2 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 179 km/h 111 mph | 167 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | 354 hp 264 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 600 V12 | 394 hp 294 kW |
Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 SL 600 V12 has 40 hp more than Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6 and Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 SL 600 V12: 40 hp (30 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 600 V12 | 570 Nm 420 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 600 V12 | 1,975 kg 4,354 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 600 V12 | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | 5.2 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 600 V12 | 6.1 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 SL 600 V12 has more power, Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6 and Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 SL 600 V12: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 600 V12 | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | 249 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 600 V12 | 199 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | 536 km 333 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 600 V12 | 714 km 444 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | 354 hp 264 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 600 V12 | 394 hp 294 kW | 6.1 s | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 600 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 |
| 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 600 V12 |
| 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 600 V12 | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | 249 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 600 V12 | 199 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 600 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 354 hp 264 kW | 394 hp 294 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 570 Nm 420 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.2 s | 6.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb | 1,975 kg 4,354 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 536 km 333 mi | 714 km 444 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 145 L 5.1 cu ft | 265 L 9.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 249 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 199 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6 | Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 SL 600 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.2 L/100 km21 mpg US25.2 mpg UK | 11.2 L/100 km21 mpg US25.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.60 LC100 km | 19.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.54 LC100 mi | 31.54 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,680 L444 US gal370 UK gal | 1,680 L444 US gal370 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,940 LC/year | 2,940 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6
- Is 555 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 50 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 SL 600 V12
- Has 40 hp more
- Has 120 Nm more
- Has 179 km (111 mi) more estimated range
- Has 120 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























