Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) · Facelift 1998
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) · Facelift 1998 AMG SL 73 V12vsMercedes-Benz SL (R129) · Facelift 1995 SL 600 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz SL (R129) · Facelift 1995
SL 600 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1998 AMG SL 73 V12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.8 s
- Fastest top speed270 km/h168 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful525 hp391 kW
- Highest torque750 Nm553 lb-ft
- Lightest1,975 kg4,354 lb
- Best power-to-weight266 hp/t198 kW/t3.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk265 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score83/100
- Best practicality score31/100
Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 SL 600 V12
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.2 L/100 km21.0 mpg US25.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption19.8 L/100 km11.9 mpg US14.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range714 km444 mi
- Best economy score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1998AMG SL 73 V12 | Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 600 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 525hp391kW | 394hp294kW |
| Torque | 750Nm553lb-ft | 570Nm420lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,975kg4,354lb | 1,975kg4,354lb |
| Gross weight | 2,320kg5,115lb | 2,320kg5,115lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 62.3s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph Calculated | 86.1s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.8s | 6.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.9s Calculated | 20.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.6s Calculated | 5.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 15.9L/100 km14.8mpg US17.8mpg UK | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 24.5L/100 km9.6mpg US11.5mpg UK | 19.8L/100 km11.9mpg US14.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.9s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 266hp/t198kW/t121hp/1000 lb Calculated | 199hp/t149kW/t90hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 380Nm/t254lb-ft/ton Calculated | 289Nm/t193lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 503km313mi Calculated | 714km444mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 7,291cc445cu in | 5,987cc365cu in |
| Length | 4,499mm177in | 4,499mm177in |
| Width | 1,812mm71in | 1,812mm71in |
| Height | 1,296mm51in | 1,296mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,515mm99in | 2,515mm99in |
| Front track | 1,553mm61in | 1,532mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,541mm61in | 1,521mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 265L | 265L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 80L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1998 AMG SL 73 V12: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 SL 600 V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1998AMG SL 73 V12 | 5,500 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 600 V12 | 5,200 rpm | 3,800 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1998AMG SL 73 V12 | Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 600 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.6 s | 5.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.8 s | 6.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.9 s | 20.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.9 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 182 km/h 113 mph | 167 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1998AMG SL 73 V12 | 525 hp 391 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 600 V12 | 394 hp 294 kW |
Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1998 AMG SL 73 V12 has 131 hp more than Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 SL 600 V12.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 SL 600 V12 and Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1998 AMG SL 73 V12: 131 hp (98 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1998AMG SL 73 V12 | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 600 V12 | 570 Nm 420 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1998AMG SL 73 V12 | 1,975 kg 4,354 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 600 V12 | 1,975 kg 4,354 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1998AMG SL 73 V12 | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 600 V12 | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1998AMG SL 73 V12 | 4.8 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 600 V12 | 6.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1998 AMG SL 73 V12 and Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 SL 600 V12: 1.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1998AMG SL 73 V12 | 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 600 V12 | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 SL 600 V12 and Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1998 AMG SL 73 V12: 4.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1998AMG SL 73 V12 | 266 hp/t 198 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 600 V12 | 199 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1998AMG SL 73 V12 | 503 km 313 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 600 V12 | 714 km 444 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1998AMG SL 73 V12 | 525 hp 391 kW | 4.8 s | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 600 V12 | 394 hp 294 kW | 6.1 s | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1998AMG SL 73 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 600 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1998AMG SL 73 V12 |
| 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 600 V12 |
| 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 SL 600 V12 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1998AMG SL 73 V12 | 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 600 V12 | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1998AMG SL 73 V12 | 266 hp/t 198 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 600 V12 | 199 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1998AMG SL 73 V12 | Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 600 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 525 hp 391 kW | 394 hp 294 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | 570 Nm 420 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.8 s | 6.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,975 kg 4,354 lb | 1,975 kg 4,354 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 503 km 313 mi | 714 km 444 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 265 L 9.4 cu ft | 265 L 9.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 266 hp/t 198 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 199 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1998 AMG SL 73 V12 | Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 SL 600 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 15.9 L/100 km14.8 mpg US17.8 mpg UK | 11.2 L/100 km21 mpg US25.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 27.83 LC100 km | 19.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 44.78 LC100 mi | 31.54 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,385 L630 US gal525 UK gal | 1,680 L444 US gal370 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,174 LC/year | 2,940 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1998 AMG SL 73 V12
- Has 131 hp more
- Has 180 Nm more
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 66 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 SL 600 V12
- Uses 4.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 211 km (131 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























