Mercedes-Benz SL (R129)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) SL 600 V12vsWiesmann Roadster 3.2i 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonWiesmann Roadster
3.2i 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) SL 600 V12
- Fastest top speed270 km/h168 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful394 hp294 kW
- Highest torque570 Nm420 lb-ft
- Best estimated range606 km377 mi
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score71/100
- Best practicality score31/100
Wiesmann Roadster 3.2i 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Lightest1,060 kg2,337 lb
- Best power-to-weight303 hp/t226 kW/t3.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.0 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK
- Best economy score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)SL 600 V12 | WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 394hp294kW | 321hp239kW |
| Torque | 570Nm420lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,980kg4,365lb | 1,060kg2,337lb |
| Gross weight | 2,320kg5,115lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 86.2s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph Calculated | 49.7s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.0s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 20.2L/100 km11.6mpg US14.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 199hp/t148kW/t90hp/1000 lb Calculated | 303hp/t226kW/t137hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 288Nm/t193lb-ft/ton Calculated | 330Nm/t221lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 606km377mi Calculated | 545km339mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,987cc365cu in | 3,201cc195cu in |
| Length | 4,470mm176in | 3,860mm152in |
| Width | 1,812mm71in | 1,750mm69in |
| Height | 1,296mm51in | 1,160mm46in |
| Wheelbase | 2,515mm99in | 2,450mm96in |
| Front track | 1,532mm60in | 1,450mm57in |
| Rear track | 1,521mm60in | 1,520mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 265L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 60L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) SL 600 V12: Power / Torque
- Wiesmann Roadster 3.2i 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)SL 600 V12 | 5,200 rpm | 3,800 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
| WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V | 7,400 rpm | 3,250 rpm | 7,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)SL 600 V12 | WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.0 s | 15.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 103 mph | 183 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)SL 600 V12 | 394 hp 294 kW |
| WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V | 321 hp 239 kW |
Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) SL 600 V12 has 73 hp more than Wiesmann Roadster 3.2i 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Wiesmann Roadster 3.2i 24V and Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) SL 600 V12: 73 hp (54 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)SL 600 V12 | 570 Nm 420 lb-ft |
| WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)SL 600 V12 | 1,980 kg 4,365 lb |
| WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V | 1,060 kg 2,337 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)SL 600 V12 | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V | 255 km/h 158 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)SL 600 V12 | 6.1 s |
| WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V | 4.9 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) SL 600 V12 has more power, Wiesmann Roadster 3.2i 24V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Wiesmann Roadster 3.2i 24V and Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) SL 600 V12: 1.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)SL 600 V12 | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK |
| WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Wiesmann Roadster 3.2i 24V and Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) SL 600 V12: 2.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)SL 600 V12 | 199 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
| WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V | 303 hp/t 226 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)SL 600 V12 | 606 km 377 mi |
| WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V | 545 km 339 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)SL 600 V12 | 394 hp 294 kW | 6.1 s | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V | 321 hp 239 kW | 4.9 s | 255 km/h 158 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)SL 600 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)SL 600 V12 |
| 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V |
| 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Wiesmann Roadster 3.2i 24V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)SL 600 V12 | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)SL 600 V12 | 199 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK |
| WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V | 303 hp/t 226 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)SL 600 V12 | WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 394 hp 294 kW | 321 hp 239 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 570 Nm 420 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 255 km/h 158 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,980 kg 4,365 lb | 1,060 kg 2,337 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 606 km 377 mi | 545 km 339 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 265 L 9.4 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 199 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 303 hp/t 226 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) SL 600 V12 | Wiesmann Roadster 3.2i 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK | 11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 23.10 LC100 km | 19.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 37.18 LC100 mi | 30.98 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,980 L523 US gal436 UK gal | 1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,465 LC/year | 2,888 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) SL 600 V12
- Has 73 hp more
- Has 220 Nm more
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 61 km (38 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Wiesmann Roadster 3.2i 24V
- Is 920 kg lighter
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 104 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























