Car comparison

Seat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSIvsMercedes-Benz R-class (W251) · Facelift 2010 R 350 CDI V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Seat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011

2.0 TSI

211 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedWagon / estate2011-2012
VS

Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) · Facelift 2010

R 350 CDI V6

265 hp2987 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2010-2014

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    239 km/h
    149 mph
  • Lightest
    1,490 kg
    3,285 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    142 hp/t
    106 kW/t
    7.1 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.0 L/100 km
    33.6 mpg US
    40.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.7 L/100 km
    24.2 mpg US
    29.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.4 L/100 km
    43.6 mpg US
    52.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    162 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,000 km
    621 mi
  • Best economy score
    88/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIMercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V6
Power
211hp157kW
265hp198kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
620Nm457lb-ft
Curb weight
1,490kg3,285lb
2,175kg4,795lb
Gross weight
2,050kg4,519lb
2,880kg6,349lb
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
To 99% top speed
71.5s99% target: 237 km/h / 147 mph
Calculated
87.8s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.3s
7.6s
0-200 km/h
26.5s
Calculated
31.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK
11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.2s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
142hp/t106kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton
Calculated
285Nm/t191lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,000km621mi
Calculated
941km585mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
2,987cc182cu in
Length
4,666mm184in
4,922mm194in
Width
1,772mm70in
1,922mm76in
Height
1,454mm57in
1,674mm66in
Wheelbase
2,642mm104in
2,980mm117in
Front track
1,522mm60in
1,661mm65in
Rear track
1,523mm60in
1,651mm65in
Trunk volume
422L
550L
Max trunk volume
1,354L
1,950L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
80L
CO2 emissions
162g/km
223g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSIMercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 CDI V6PowerTorque
  • Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 CDI V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI4,600-6,000 rpm1,500-4,600 rpm6,250 rpm
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V63,800 rpm1,600-2,400 rpm4,050 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIMercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.3 s
7.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
26.5 s
31.6 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.2 s
15.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
158 km/h
98 mph
151 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 CDI V6 has 54 hp more than Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 CDI V6: 54 hp (40 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V6
620 Nm
457 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
1,490 kg
3,285 lb
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V6
2,175 kg
4,795 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
239 km/h
149 mph
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V6
235 km/h
146 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 CDI V6 has more power, Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 CDI V6: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V6
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 CDI V6: 1.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V6
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
211 hp
157 kW
7.3 s
239 km/h
149 mph
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V6
265 hp
198 kW
7.6 s
235 km/h
146 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
422 L
14.9 cu ft
Length
4,666 mm
183.7 in
Height
1,454 mm
57.2 in
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V6
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,922 mm
193.8 in
Height
1,674 mm
65.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V6
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 CDI V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
7.3 s
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V6
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
7.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V6
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIMercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V6
Power
211 hp
157 kW
265 hp
198 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
620 Nm
457 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.3 s
7.6 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Lightness
1,490 kg
3,285 lb
2,175 kg
4,795 lb
Fuel consumption
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
422 L
14.9 cu ft
Length
4,666 mm
183.7 in
Height
1,454 mm
57.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,922 mm
193.8 in
Height
1,674 mm
65.9 in
Range score
1,000 km
621 mi
941 km
585 mi
CO2 score
162 g/km
223 g/km
Trunk score
422 L
14.9 cu ft
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSeat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSIMercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 CDI V6
Consumption7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.25 LC100 km14.88 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.71 LC100 mi23.94 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,838 LC/year2,231 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI

  • Is 685 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 59 km (37 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 61 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI
Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) R 350 CDI V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Seat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI vs Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) · Facelift 2010 R 350 CDI V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster