Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 V6vsMercedes-Benz M-class (W163) · Facelift 2001 ML 500 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204)

GLK 350 V6

272 hp3498 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2008-2011
VS

Mercedes-Benz M-class (W163) · Facelift 2001

ML 500 V8

292 hp4966 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2001-2005

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph
  • Lightest
    1,755 kg
    3,869 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    155 hp/t
    116 kW/t
    6.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    10.8 L/100 km
    21.8 mpg US
    26.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    14.6 L/100 km
    16.1 mpg US
    19.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.5 L/100 km
    27.7 mpg US
    33.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    611 km
    380 mi
  • Best overall score
    64/100
  • Best performance score
    55/100
  • Best economy score
    78/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 V6Mercedes-BenzM-class (W163)Facelift 2001ML 500 V8
Power
272hp203kW
292hp218kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
440Nm325lb-ft
Curb weight
1,755kg3,869lb
2,135kg4,707lb
Gross weight
2,480kg5,467lb
2,870kg6,327lb
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
To 99% top speed
78.8s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
102.1s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.7s
7.7s
0-200 km/h
30.1s
Calculated
42.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.3s
Calculated
7.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK
14.6L/100 km16.1mpg US19.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
14.6L/100 km16.1mpg US19.3mpg UK
20.5L/100 km11.5mpg US13.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.8s
Calculated
15.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
155hp/t116kW/t70hp/1000 lb
Calculated
137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
206Nm/t138lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
611km380mi
Calculated
568km353mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,498cc213cu in
4,966cc303cu in
Length
4,525mm178in
4,638mm183in
Width
1,840mm72in
1,840mm72in
Height
1,689mm66in
1,820mm72in
Wheelbase
2,755mm108in
2,820mm111in
Front track
1,567mm62in
1,555mm61in
Rear track
1,588mm63in
1,555mm61in
Ground clearance
201mm8in
204mm8in
Trunk volume
450L
633L
Max trunk volume
1,550L
2,020L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
83L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 V6Mercedes-Benz M-class (W163) Facelift 2001 ML 500 V8PowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 V6: Power / Torque
  • Mercedes-Benz M-class (W163) Facelift 2001 ML 500 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 V66,000 rpm2,400-5,000 rpm6,250 rpm
Mercedes-BenzM-class (W163)Facelift 2001ML 500 V85,600 rpm2,700-4,250 rpm6,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 V6Mercedes-BenzM-class (W163)Facelift 2001ML 500 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.3 s
7.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.7 s
7.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
30.1 s
42.7 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.6 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.4 s
13.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.8 s
15.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
155 km/h
96 mph
144 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Mercedes-Benz M-class (W163) Facelift 2001 ML 500 V8 has 20 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 V6.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 V6 and Mercedes-Benz M-class (W163) Facelift 2001 ML 500 V8: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 V6
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzM-class (W163)Facelift 2001ML 500 V8
440 Nm
325 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 V6
1,755 kg
3,869 lb
Mercedes-BenzM-class (W163)Facelift 2001ML 500 V8
2,135 kg
4,707 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 V6
230 km/h
143 mph
Mercedes-BenzM-class (W163)Facelift 2001ML 500 V8
222 km/h
138 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Mercedes-Benz M-class (W163) Facelift 2001 ML 500 V8 has more power, Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 V6 and Mercedes-Benz M-class (W163) Facelift 2001 ML 500 V8: 1.0 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 V6
10.8 L/100 km
21.8 mpg US
26.2 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzM-class (W163)Facelift 2001ML 500 V8
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 V6 and Mercedes-Benz M-class (W163) Facelift 2001 ML 500 V8: 3.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 V6
155 hp/t
116 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzM-class (W163)Facelift 2001ML 500 V8
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 V6
272 hp
203 kW
6.7 s
230 km/h
143 mph
Mercedes-BenzM-class (W163)Facelift 2001ML 500 V8
292 hp
218 kW
7.7 s
222 km/h
138 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 V6
Power
272 hp
203 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,525 mm
178.1 in
Height
1,689 mm
66.5 in
Mercedes-BenzM-class (W163)Facelift 2001ML 500 V8
Power
292 hp
218 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
633 L
22.4 cu ft
Length
4,638 mm
182.6 in
Height
1,820 mm
71.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 V6
Power
272 hp
203 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
10.8 L/100 km
21.8 mpg US
26.2 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzM-class (W163)Facelift 2001ML 500 V8
Power
292 hp
218 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 V6
10.8 L/100 km
21.8 mpg US
26.2 mpg UK
6.7 s
Mercedes-BenzM-class (W163)Facelift 2001ML 500 V8
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK
7.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 V6
155 hp/t
116 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
10.8 L/100 km
21.8 mpg US
26.2 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzM-class (W163)Facelift 2001ML 500 V8
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 V6Mercedes-BenzM-class (W163)Facelift 2001ML 500 V8
Power
272 hp
203 kW
292 hp
218 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
440 Nm
325 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.7 s
7.7 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
Lightness
1,755 kg
3,869 lb
2,135 kg
4,707 lb
Fuel consumption
10.8 L/100 km
21.8 mpg US
26.2 mpg UK
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,525 mm
178.1 in
Height
1,689 mm
66.5 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
633 L
22.4 cu ft
Length
4,638 mm
182.6 in
Height
1,820 mm
71.7 in
Range score
611 km
380 mi
568 km
353 mi
Trunk score
450 L
15.9 cu ft
633 L
22.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
155 hp/t
116 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 V6Mercedes-Benz M-class (W163) Facelift 2001 ML 500 V8
Consumption10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK14.6 L/100 km16.1 mpg US19.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km18.90 LC100 km25.55 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi30.42 LC100 mi41.12 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,620 L428 US gal356 UK gal2,190 L579 US gal482 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,835 LC/year3,833 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 V6

  • Is 380 kg lighter
  • Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 3.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 43 km (26 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 V6
Mercedes-Benz M-class (W163) ML 500 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 V6 vs Mercedes-Benz M-class (W163) · Facelift 2001 ML 500 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster