Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 CDI V6vsNissan Murano II (Z51) · Facelift 2010 3.5 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan Murano II (Z51) · Facelift 2010
3.5 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 CDI V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Highest torque540 Nm398 lb-ft
- Lightest1,805 kg3,979 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range786 km488 mi
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Nissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6
- Most powerful256 hp191 kW
- Best power-to-weight140 hp/t104 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6 | NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 256hp191kW |
| Torque | 540Nm398lb-ft | 334Nm246lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,805kg3,979lb | 1,830kg4,034lb |
| Gross weight | 2,500kg5,512lb | 2,297kg5,064lb |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 87.0s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 90.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.7s Calculated | 41.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 7.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 128hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 299Nm/t200lb-ft/ton Calculated | 183Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 786km488mi Calculated | 774km481mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,987cc182cu in | 3,498cc213cu in |
| Length | 4,525mm178in | 4,860mm191in |
| Width | 1,840mm72in | 1,885mm74in |
| Height | 1,698mm67in | 1,720mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 2,755mm108in | 2,825mm111in |
| Front track | 1,567mm62in | 1,610mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,588mm63in | 1,610mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 201mm8in | 178mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 402L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,550L | 1,510L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 82L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 248g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 CDI V6: Power / Torque
- Nissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6 | 3,800 rpm | 1,600-2,400 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6 | 6,000 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6 | NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 7.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.7 s | 41.6 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6 | 231 hp 172 kW |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6 | 256 hp 191 kW |
Nissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6 has 25 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 CDI V6.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 CDI V6 and Nissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6: 25 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6 | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6 | 334 Nm 246 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6 | 1,805 kg 3,979 lb |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6 | 1,830 kg 4,034 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6 | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6 | 7.3 s |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6 | 8.0 s |
Although Nissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6 has more power, Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 CDI V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 CDI V6 and Nissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 CDI V6 and Nissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6: 2.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6 | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6 | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6 | 786 km 488 mi |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6 | 774 km 481 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6 | 231 hp 172 kW | 7.3 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6 | 256 hp 191 kW | 8.0 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6 |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6 |
| 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 CDI V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6 | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6 | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6 | NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 256 hp 191 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft | 334 Nm 246 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,805 kg 3,979 lb | 1,830 kg 4,034 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 786 km 488 mi | 774 km 481 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 248 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 402 L 14.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 CDI V6 | Nissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.70 LC100 km | 18.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi | 29.85 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal | 1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,205 LC/year | 2,783 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 CDI V6
- Has 206 Nm more
- Is 25 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 12 km (8 mi) more estimated range
- Has 48 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Nissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6
- Has 25 hp more
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























