Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 CDI V6vsNissan Murano II (Z51) · Facelift 2010 3.5 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204)

GLK 350 CDI V6

231 hp2987 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2010-2012
VS

Nissan Murano II (Z51) · Facelift 2010

3.5 V6

256 hp3498 ccGasolineAWDCVTNaturally aspiratedSUV2010-2014

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 CDI V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    225 km/h
    140 mph
  • Highest torque
    540 Nm
    398 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,805 kg
    3,979 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.4 L/100 km
    28.0 mpg US
    33.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.6 L/100 km
    22.2 mpg US
    26.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.1 L/100 km
    33.1 mpg US
    39.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    786 km
    488 mi
  • Largest trunk
    450 L
  • Best overall score
    64/100
  • Best performance score
    55/100
  • Best economy score
    84/100
  • Best practicality score
    82/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6
Power
231hp172kW
256hp191kW
Torque
540Nm398lb-ft
334Nm246lb-ft
Curb weight
1,805kg3,979lb
1,830kg4,034lb
Gross weight
2,500kg5,512lb
2,297kg5,064lb
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
87.0s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
90.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.3s
8.0s
0-200 km/h
35.7s
Calculated
41.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.9s
Calculated
7.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK
14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
15.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
128hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
299Nm/t200lb-ft/ton
Calculated
183Nm/t122lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
786km488mi
Calculated
774km481mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,987cc182cu in
3,498cc213cu in
Length
4,525mm178in
4,860mm191in
Width
1,840mm72in
1,885mm74in
Height
1,698mm67in
1,720mm68in
Wheelbase
2,755mm108in
2,825mm111in
Front track
1,567mm62in
1,610mm63in
Rear track
1,588mm63in
1,610mm63in
Ground clearance
201mm8in
178mm7in
Trunk volume
450L
402L
Max trunk volume
1,550L
1,510L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
82L
CO2 emissions-
248g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 CDI V6Nissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6PowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 CDI V6: Power / Torque
  • Nissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V63,800 rpm1,600-2,400 rpm4,050 rpm
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V66,000 rpm4,400 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.9 s
7.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.3 s
8.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
35.7 s
41.6 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.9 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.8 s
13.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
15.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
149 km/h
93 mph
145 km/h
90 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6
231 hp
172 kW
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6
256 hp
191 kW

Nissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6 has 25 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 CDI V6.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 CDI V6 and Nissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6: 25 hp (19 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6
540 Nm
398 lb-ft
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6
334 Nm
246 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6
1,805 kg
3,979 lb
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6
1,830 kg
4,034 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6
225 km/h
140 mph
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Nissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6 has more power, Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 CDI V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 CDI V6 and Nissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 CDI V6 and Nissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6: 2.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6
128 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6
786 km
488 mi
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6
774 km
481 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6
231 hp
172 kW
7.3 s
225 km/h
140 mph
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6
256 hp
191 kW
8.0 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,525 mm
178.1 in
Height
1,698 mm
66.9 in
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6
Power
256 hp
191 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Length
4,860 mm
191.3 in
Height
1,720 mm
67.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6
Power
256 hp
191 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 CDI V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
7.3 s
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK
8.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6
128 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6
Power
231 hp
172 kW
256 hp
191 kW
Torque
540 Nm
398 lb-ft
334 Nm
246 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.3 s
8.0 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
1,805 kg
3,979 lb
1,830 kg
4,034 lb
Fuel consumption
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,525 mm
178.1 in
Height
1,698 mm
66.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Length
4,860 mm
191.3 in
Height
1,720 mm
67.7 in
Range score
786 km
488 mi
774 km
481 mi
CO2 score
-
248 g/km
Trunk score
450 L
15.9 cu ft
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
128 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 CDI V6Nissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6
Consumption8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.70 LC100 km18.55 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.66 LC100 mi29.85 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,205 LC/year2,783 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 CDI V6

  • Has 206 Nm more
  • Is 25 kg lighter
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 12 km (8 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 48 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power

Nissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6

  • Has 25 hp more
  • Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 CDI V6
Nissan Murano II (Z51) 3.5 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 CDI V6 vs Nissan Murano II (Z51) · Facelift 2010 3.5 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster