Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 CDI V6vsBMW X1 (E84) 25i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X1 (E84)
25i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 CDI V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Most powerful231 hp172 kW
- Highest torque540 Nm398 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range786 km488 mi
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score82/100
BMW X1 (E84) 25i
- Lightest1,600 kg3,527 lb
- Best power-to-weight136 hp/t102 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6 | BMWX1 (E84)25i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 218hp163kW |
| Torque | 540Nm398lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,805kg3,979lb | 1,600kg3,527lb |
| Gross weight | 2,500kg5,512lb | 2,180kg4,806lb |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 86.8s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 81.8s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.7s Calculated | 36.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK | 12.9L/100 km18.2mpg US21.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 128hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 136hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 299Nm/t200lb-ft/ton Calculated | 175Nm/t117lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 786km488mi Calculated | 677km421mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,987cc182cu in | 2,996cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,525mm178in | 4,454mm175in |
| Width | 1,840mm72in | 1,798mm71in |
| Height | 1,698mm67in | 1,545mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,755mm108in | 2,760mm109in |
| Front track | 1,567mm62in | 1,500mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,588mm63in | 1,529mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 201mm8in | 194mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 420L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,550L | 1,350L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 63L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 CDI V6: Power / Torque
- BMW X1 (E84) 25i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6 | 3,800 rpm | 1,600-2,400 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
| BMWX1 (E84)25i | 6,100 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6 | BMWX1 (E84)25i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.7 s | 36.5 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6 | 231 hp 172 kW |
| BMWX1 (E84)25i | 218 hp 163 kW |
Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 CDI V6 has 13 hp more than BMW X1 (E84) 25i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X1 (E84) 25i and Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 CDI V6: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6 | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft |
| BMWX1 (E84)25i | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6 | 1,805 kg 3,979 lb |
| BMWX1 (E84)25i | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6 | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| BMWX1 (E84)25i | 223 km/h 139 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6 | 7.3 s |
| BMWX1 (E84)25i | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 CDI V6 and BMW X1 (E84) 25i: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| BMWX1 (E84)25i | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 CDI V6 and BMW X1 (E84) 25i: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6 | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
| BMWX1 (E84)25i | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6 | 786 km 488 mi |
| BMWX1 (E84)25i | 677 km 421 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6 | 231 hp 172 kW | 7.3 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| BMWX1 (E84)25i | 218 hp 163 kW | 7.9 s | 223 km/h 139 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX1 (E84)25i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6 |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX1 (E84)25i |
| 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 CDI V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| BMWX1 (E84)25i | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6 | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| BMWX1 (E84)25i | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6 | BMWX1 (E84)25i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 218 hp 163 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,805 kg 3,979 lb | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 786 km 488 mi | 677 km 421 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 CDI V6 | BMW X1 (E84) 25i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK | 9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.70 LC100 km | 16.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi | 26.19 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal | 1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,205 LC/year | 2,441 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 CDI V6
- Has 13 hp more
- Has 260 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 108 km (67 mi) more estimated range
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
BMW X1 (E84) 25i
- Is 205 kg lighter
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























