Subaru Forester III
Car comparison
Subaru Forester III 2.5 XTvsMercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 300 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GLK (X204)
GLK 300 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Subaru Forester III 2.5 XT
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Fastest top speed216 km/h134 mph
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,485 kg3,274 lb
- Best power-to-weight155 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score55/100
Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 300 V6
- Most powerful231 hp172 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption14.1 L/100 km16.7 mpg US20.0 mpg UK
- Best estimated range629 km391 mi
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best economy score79/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SubaruForester III2.5 XT | Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 300 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 230hp172kW | 231hp172kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,485kg3,274lb | 1,755kg3,869lb |
| Gross weight | 2,000kg4,409lb | 2,480kg5,467lb |
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 58.2s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph Calculated | 80.9s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.0s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.5s Calculated | 49.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.7s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK | 14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 155hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated | 171Nm/t114lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 561km348mi Calculated | 629km391mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,457cc150cu in | 2,996cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,485mm177in | 4,528mm178in |
| Width | 1,735mm68in | 1,840mm72in |
| Height | 1,590mm63in | 1,689mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,525mm99in | 2,755mm108in |
| Front track | 1,495mm59in | 1,567mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,485mm58in | 1,569mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 201mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 387L | 450L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,550L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Subaru Forester III 2.5 XT: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 300 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruForester III2.5 XT | 5,200 rpm | 2,800 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 300 V6 | 6,000 rpm | 2,500-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SubaruForester III2.5 XT | Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 300 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.7 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.0 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.5 s | 49.1 s |
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruForester III2.5 XT | 230 hp 172 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 300 V6 | 231 hp 172 kW |
Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 300 V6 has 1 hp more than Subaru Forester III 2.5 XT.
The biggest power difference is between Subaru Forester III 2.5 XT and Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 300 V6: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruForester III2.5 XT | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 300 V6 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruForester III2.5 XT | 1,485 kg 3,274 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 300 V6 | 1,755 kg 3,869 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruForester III2.5 XT | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 300 V6 | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruForester III2.5 XT | 6.0 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 300 V6 | 7.6 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 300 V6 has more power, Subaru Forester III 2.5 XT is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Subaru Forester III 2.5 XT and Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 300 V6: 1.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruForester III2.5 XT | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 300 V6 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruForester III2.5 XT | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 300 V6 | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruForester III2.5 XT | 561 km 348 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 300 V6 | 629 km 391 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruForester III2.5 XT | 230 hp 172 kW | 6.0 s | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 300 V6 | 231 hp 172 kW | 7.6 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruForester III2.5 XT |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 300 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruForester III2.5 XT |
| 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 300 V6 |
| 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Subaru Forester III 2.5 XT is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SubaruForester III2.5 XT | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | 6.0 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 300 V6 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SubaruForester III2.5 XT | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 300 V6 | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SubaruForester III2.5 XT | Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 300 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 230 hp 172 kW | 231 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.0 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,485 kg 3,274 lb | 1,755 kg 3,869 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 561 km 348 mi | 629 km 391 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 387 L 13.7 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Subaru Forester III 2.5 XT | Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 300 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.7 L/100 km22 mpg US26.4 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.72 LC100 km | 18.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.13 LC100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,605 L424 US gal353 UK gal | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,809 LC/year | 2,756 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Subaru Forester III 2.5 XT
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 270 kg lighter
- Is 1.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 300 V6
- Has 1 hp more
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 68 km (42 mi) more estimated range
- Has 63 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























