AUDI Q5 I (8R)
Car comparison
AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.0 TDI V6vsMercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 300 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GLK (X204)
GLK 300 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.0 TDI V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,000 km621 mi
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score86/100
Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 300 V6
- Lightest1,755 kg3,869 lb
- Best power-to-weight132 hp/t98 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6 | Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 300 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 231hp172kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,865kg4,112lb | 1,755kg3,869lb |
| Gross weight | 2,445kg5,390lb | 2,480kg5,467lb |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.9s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 80.9s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.1s Calculated | 49.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 129hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 268Nm/t179lb-ft/ton Calculated | 171Nm/t114lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,000km621mi Calculated | 629km391mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,967cc181cu in | 2,996cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,629mm182in | 4,528mm178in |
| Width | 1,880mm74in | 1,840mm72in |
| Height | 1,653mm65in | 1,689mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,807mm111in | 2,755mm108in |
| Front track | 1,617mm64in | 1,567mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,613mm64in | 1,569mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 200mm8in | 201mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 450L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,560L | 1,550L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.0 TDI V6: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 300 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6 | 4,000-4,400 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 300 V6 | 6,000 rpm | 2,500-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6 | Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 300 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.1 s | 49.1 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6 | 240 hp 179 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 300 V6 | 231 hp 172 kW |
AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.0 TDI V6 has 9 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 300 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 300 V6 and AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.0 TDI V6: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 300 V6 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6 | 1,865 kg 4,112 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 300 V6 | 1,755 kg 3,869 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6 | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 300 V6 | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6 | 6.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 300 V6 | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.0 TDI V6 and Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 300 V6: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 300 V6 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.0 TDI V6 and Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 300 V6: 3.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6 | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 300 V6 | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6 | 1,000 km 621 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 300 V6 | 629 km 391 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6 | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.5 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 300 V6 | 231 hp 172 kW | 7.6 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 300 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6 |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 300 V6 |
| 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.0 TDI V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 300 V6 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6 | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 300 V6 | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6 | Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 300 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 231 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,865 kg 4,112 lb | 1,755 kg 3,869 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,000 km 621 mi | 629 km 391 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.0 TDI V6 | Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 300 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.13 LC100 km | 18.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,969 LC/year | 2,756 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.0 TDI V6
- Has 9 hp more
- Has 200 Nm more
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 3.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 371 km (231 mi) more estimated range
- Has 90 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 300 V6
- Is 110 kg lighter
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























