Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) · Facelift 2023
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) · Facelift 2023 GLB 250vsMercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GLS (X167)
GLS 350d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 250
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.0 s
- Fastest top speed236 km/h147 mph
- Lightest1,690 kg3,726 lb
- Best power-to-weight133 hp/t99 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk565 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350d
- Most powerful286 hp213 kW
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,111 km690 mi
- Best performance score58/100
- Best economy score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 224hp167kW | 286hp213kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 600Nm443lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,690kg3,726lb | 2,425kg5,346lb |
| Gross weight | 2,265kg4,993lb | 3,250kg7,165lb |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.5s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 96.2s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.0s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.3s Calculated | 36.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 118hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 207Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated | 247Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 714km444mi Calculated | 1,111km690mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 2,925cc178cu in |
| Length | 4,634mm182in | 5,207mm205in |
| Width | 1,834mm72in | 1,956mm77in |
| Height | 1,697mm67in | 1,838mm72in |
| Wheelbase | 2,829mm111in | 3,135mm123in |
| Front track | 1,604mm63in | 1,669mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,604mm63in | 1,692mm67in |
| Ground clearance | 135mm5in | 215mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 565L | 355L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,800L | 2,400L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 90L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 250: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 5,500-6,100 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d | 3,400-4,600 rpm | 1,200-3,200 rpm | 4,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.3 s | 36.2 s |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 97 mph | 149 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 224 hp 167 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d | 286 hp 213 kW |
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350d has 62 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 250.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 250 and Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350d: 62 hp (46 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d | 2,425 kg 5,346 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d | 227 km/h 141 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 7.0 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d | 7.0 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350d has more power, Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 250 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 714 km 444 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d | 1,111 km 690 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 224 hp 167 kW | 7.0 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d | 286 hp 213 kW | 7.0 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 224 hp 167 kW | 286 hp 213 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.0 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb | 2,425 kg 5,346 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 714 km 444 mi | 1,111 km 690 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 565 L 20.0 cu ft | 355 L 12.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 250 | Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.70 LC100 km | 14.17 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,205 LC/year | 2,126 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 250
- Is 735 kg lighter
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 210 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350d
- Has 62 hp more
- Has 250 Nm more
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 397 km (247 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























