Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II)
Car comparison
Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTechvsMercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 220d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GLB (X247)
GLB 220d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 220d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,091 km678 mi
- Largest trunk570 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech
- Fastest top speed222 km/h138 mph
- Lightest1,429 kg3,150 lb
- Best power-to-weight127 hp/t94 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 220d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 181hp135kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,429kg3,150lb | 1,660kg3,660lb |
| Gross weight | 1,970kg4,343lb | 2,250kg4,960lb |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.1s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 76.7s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.0s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.0s Calculated | 38.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.6s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 127hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 175Nm/t117lb-ft/ton Calculated | 241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 679km422mi Calculated | 1,091km678mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,598cc98cu in | 1,951cc119cu in |
| Length | 4,447mm175in | 4,634mm182in |
| Width | 1,841mm72in | 1,834mm72in |
| Height | 1,624mm64in | 1,662mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,675mm105in | 2,829mm111in |
| Front track | 1,601mm63in | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,610mm63in | 1,606mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 219mm9in | 135mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 520L | 570L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,482L | 1,805L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 53L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 146g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 220d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 5,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 220d | 3,800 rpm | 1,600-2,400 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 220d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.6 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.0 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.0 s | 38.8 s |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 91 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 181 hp 135 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 220d | 190 hp 142 kW |
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 220d has 9 hp more than Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech.
The biggest power difference is between Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech and Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 220d: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 220d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 1,429 kg 3,150 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 220d | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 220d | 217 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 8.0 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 220d | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 220d and Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 220d | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 220d and Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech: 2.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 220d | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 679 km 422 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 220d | 1,091 km 678 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 181 hp 135 kW | 8.0 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 220d | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.6 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 220d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 220d |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 220d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 220d | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 220d | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 220d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 181 hp 135 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.0 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,429 kg 3,150 lb | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 679 km 422 mi | 1,091 km 678 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 146 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | 570 L 20.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech | Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 220d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.65 LC100 km | 9.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,048 LC/year | 1,444 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech
- Is 231 kg lighter
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 220d
- Has 9 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 411 km (256 mi) more estimated range
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























