Mini Countryman (F60)
Car comparison
Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0vsMercedes-Benz GLA (X156) · Facelift 2017 GLA 250
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GLA (X156) · Facelift 2017
GLA 250
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed234 km/h145 mph
- Most powerful231 hp172 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight149 hp/t111 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250
- Lightest1,430 kg3,153 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range848 km527 mi
- Best economy score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 211hp157kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,555kg3,428lb | 1,430kg3,153lb |
| Gross weight | 2,150kg4,740lb | 2,015kg4,442lb |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.4s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated | 67.6s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.8s Calculated | 27.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 149hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 225Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated | 245Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 739km459mi Calculated | 848km527mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,991cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,299mm169in | 4,424mm174in |
| Width | 1,822mm72in | 1,804mm71in |
| Height | 1,557mm61in | 1,494mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,699mm106in |
| Front track | 1,565mm62in | 1,569mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,567mm62in | 1,560mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 421L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,390L | 1,235L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 56L |
| CO2 emissions | 158g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,450-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.8 s | 27.3 s |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | 231 hp 172 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 211 hp 157 kW |
Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0 has 20 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250 and Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | 6.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 6.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0 and Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | 739 km 459 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 848 km 527 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | 231 hp 172 kW | 6.5 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 211 hp 157 kW | 6.6 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 211 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 739 km 459 mi | 848 km 527 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 158 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 421 L 14.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0 | Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.08 LC100 km | 11.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,811 LC/year | 1,733 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0
- Has 20 hp more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 29 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250
- Is 125 kg lighter
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 109 km (68 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























