Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) · Facelift 2017 GLA 250vsMini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Countryman (F60)
JCW 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,385 kg3,053 lb
- Best power-to-weight152 hp/t114 kW/t6.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range833 km518 mi
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best economy score91/100
Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Most powerful231 hp172 kW
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best practicality score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 211hp157kW | 231hp172kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,385kg3,053lb | 1,555kg3,428lb |
| Gross weight | 1,970kg4,343lb | 2,150kg4,740lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 68.1s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 72.4s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.7s Calculated | 26.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 152hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 149hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 253Nm/t169lb-ft/ton Calculated | 225Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 833km518mi Calculated | 739km459mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,424mm174in | 4,299mm169in |
| Width | 1,804mm71in | 1,822mm72in |
| Height | 1,494mm59in | 1,557mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,699mm106in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,569mm62in | 1,565mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,560mm61in | 1,567mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 421L | 450L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,235L | 1,390L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 51L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 158g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250: Power / Torque
- Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,450-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.7 s | 26.8 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 99 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 211 hp 157 kW |
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | 231 hp 172 kW |
Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0 has 20 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250 and Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 1,385 kg 3,053 lb |
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | 234 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 6.6 s |
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | 6.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0 and Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250 and Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 152 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 833 km 518 mi |
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | 739 km 459 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 211 hp 157 kW | 6.6 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | 231 hp 172 kW | 6.5 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 152 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 211 hp 157 kW | 231 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,385 kg 3,053 lb | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 833 km 518 mi | 739 km 459 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 158 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 421 L 14.9 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 152 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250 | Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.50 LC100 km | 12.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,575 LC/year | 1,811 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250
- Is 170 kg lighter
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 94 km (59 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0
- Has 20 hp more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 29 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























