Car comparison

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0vsMercedes-Benz GLA (X156) · Facelift 2017 GLA 220d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mini Countryman (F60)

Cooper SD 2.0

190 hp1995 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2020
VS

Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) · Facelift 2017

GLA 220d

170 hp2143 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2018-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    218 km/h
    135 mph
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    360 Nm
    266 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    121 hp/t
    90 kW/t
    8.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.9 L/100 km
    48.0 mpg US
    57.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.6 L/100 km
    51.1 mpg US
    61.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,041 km
    647 mi
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    49/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d
Power
190hp142kW
170hp127kW
Torque
360Nm266lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,575kg3,472lb
1,520kg3,351lb
Gross weight
2,170kg4,784lb
2,090kg4,608lb
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
79.0s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph
Calculated
77.5s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.6s
7.7s
0-200 km/h
38.8s
Calculated
38.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.2s
Calculated
7.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.5s
Calculated
15.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
112hp/t83kW/t51hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton
Calculated
230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,041km647mi
Calculated
918km570mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
2,143cc131cu in
Length
4,299mm169in
4,424mm174in
Width
1,822mm72in
1,804mm71in
Height
1,557mm61in
1,494mm59in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,699mm106in
Front track
1,563mm62in
1,569mm62in
Rear track
1,565mm62in
1,560mm61in
Ground clearance
165mm6in
-
Trunk volume
450L
481L
Max trunk volume
1,390L
1,235L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
51L
56L
CO2 emissions
130g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 220dPowerTorque
  • Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 220d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.04,000 rpm1,500-2,750 rpm4,250 rpm
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d3,400-4,000 rpm1,400-3,400 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.2 s
7.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.6 s
7.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
38.8 s
38.4 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.1 s
13.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.5 s
15.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
190 hp
142 kW
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d
170 hp
127 kW

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 has 20 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 220d.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 220d and Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
360 Nm
266 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
1,575 kg
3,472 lb
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d
1,520 kg
3,351 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
218 km/h
135 mph
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d
218 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 and Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 220d: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 and Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 220d: 1.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d
112 hp/t
83 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
1,041 km
647 mi
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d
918 km
570 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
190 hp
142 kW
7.6 s
218 km/h
135 mph
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d
170 hp
127 kW
7.7 s
218 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
481 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,424 mm
174.2 in
Height
1,494 mm
58.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
7.6 s
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
7.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d
112 hp/t
83 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d
Power
190 hp
142 kW
170 hp
127 kW
Torque
360 Nm
266 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.6 s
7.7 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,575 kg
3,472 lb
1,520 kg
3,351 lb
Fuel consumption
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
481 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,424 mm
174.2 in
Height
1,494 mm
58.8 in
Range score
1,041 km
647 mi
918 km
570 mi
CO2 score
130 g/km
-
Trunk score
450 L
15.9 cu ft
481 L
17.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
112 hp/t
83 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 220d
Consumption4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.58 LC100 km10.67 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi13.80 LC100 mi17.18 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used735 L194 US gal162 UK gal915 L242 US gal201 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,286 LC/year1,601 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Has 10 Nm more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 123 km (76 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 220d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 vs Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) · Facelift 2017 GLA 220d - car comparison - FastVsFaster