Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) · Facelift 2017 GLA 200vsMercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) · Facelift 2017

GLA 200

156 hp1595 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2017-2019
VS

Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247)

GLB 200

163 hp1332 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2019-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 200

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    215 km/h
    134 mph
  • Highest torque
    250 Nm
    184 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,360 kg
    2,998 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    115 hp/t
    86 kW/t
    8.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.4 L/100 km
    31.8 mpg US
    38.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.9 L/100 km
    48.0 mpg US
    57.6 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    862 km
    536 mi
  • Best overall score
    56/100
  • Best performance score
    45/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200
Power
156hp116kW
163hp122kW
Torque
250Nm184lb-ft
250Nm184lb-ft
Curb weight
1,360kg2,998lb
1,480kg3,263lb
Gross weight
1,940kg4,277lb
2,085kg4,597lb
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
207 km/h
129 mph
To 99% top speed
78.2s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
84.7s99% target: 205 km/h / 127 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.1s
9.1s
0-200 km/h
42.0s
Calculated
59.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.7s
Calculated
8.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.9s
Calculated
16.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
184Nm/t123lb-ft/ton
Calculated
169Nm/t113lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
862km536mi
Calculated
839km521mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,595cc97cu in
1,332cc81cu in
Length
4,424mm174in
4,634mm182in
Width
1,804mm71in
1,834mm72in
Height
1,494mm59in
1,662mm65in
Wheelbase
2,699mm106in
2,829mm111in
Front track
1,569mm62in
1,605mm63in
Rear track
1,560mm61in
1,606mm63in
Ground clearance-
135mm5in
Trunk volume
421L
570L
Max trunk volume
1,235L
1,805L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
52L
CO2 emissions-
142g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 200Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200PowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 200: Power / Torque
  • Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 2005,300 rpm1,250-4,000 rpm5,550 rpm
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 2005,500 rpm1,620-4,000 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.7 s
8.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.1 s
9.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
42.0 s
59.6 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
207 km/h
129 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
7.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.4 s
10.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.4 s
14.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.9 s
16.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
146 km/h
91 mph
139 km/h
86 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200
156 hp
116 kW
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200
163 hp
122 kW

Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200 has 7 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 200.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 200 and Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200: 7 hp (5 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200
250 Nm
184 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200
1,360 kg
2,998 lb
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200
1,480 kg
3,263 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200
215 km/h
134 mph
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200
207 km/h
129 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 2008.1 s
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 2009.1 s

Although Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200 has more power, Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 200 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 200 and Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200: 1.0 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200
115 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200
862 km
536 mi
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200
839 km
521 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200
156 hp
116 kW
8.1 s
215 km/h
134 mph
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200
163 hp
122 kW
9.1 s
207 km/h
129 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200
Power
156 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
421 L
14.9 cu ft
Length
4,424 mm
174.2 in
Height
1,494 mm
58.8 in
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200
Power
163 hp
122 kW
0-100 km/h9.1 s
Top speed
207 km/h
129 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
570 L
20.1 cu ft
Length
4,634 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,662 mm
65.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200
Power
156 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200
Power
163 hp
122 kW
0-100 km/h9.1 s
Top speed
207 km/h
129 mph
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 200 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
8.1 s
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
9.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200
115 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200
Power
156 hp
116 kW
163 hp
122 kW
Torque
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.1 s
9.1 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
207 km/h
129 mph
Lightness
1,360 kg
2,998 lb
1,480 kg
3,263 lb
Fuel consumption
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
421 L
14.9 cu ft
Length
4,424 mm
174.2 in
Height
1,494 mm
58.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
570 L
20.1 cu ft
Length
4,634 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,662 mm
65.4 in
Range score
862 km
536 mi
839 km
521 mi
CO2 score
-
142 g/km
Trunk score
421 L
14.9 cu ft
570 L
20.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
115 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 200Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200
Consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.15 LC100 km10.85 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.33 LC100 mi17.46 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used870 L230 US gal191 UK gal930 L246 US gal205 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,523 LC/year1,628 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 200

  • Is 120 kg lighter
  • Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 23 km (15 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200

  • Has 7 hp more
  • Has 149 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 200
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

GLA 200
GLA 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200vsMercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200
GLB 200
GLB 200d
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200vsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d
GLA 200
GLA 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200vsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200
GLB 200
GLB 200+ 85 kWh
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200vsMercedes-BenzGLB (X244)GLB 200+ 85 kWh
GLA 200
GLA 250e
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200vsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250e
GLA 200
GLB 200d
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200vsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d
GLB 200
GLA 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200vsMercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200
GLA 200
1.5 TSI
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200vsVolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI
GLA 200
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200vsMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
GLB 200
200
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200vsLexusUX200
GLA 200
1.5 TSI EVO
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200vsSeatArona1.5 TSI EVO
GLB 200
35 TDI
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) · Facelift 2017 GLA 200 vs Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200 - car comparison - FastVsFaster