AUDI Q5 II (FY) · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
AUDI Q5 II (FY) · Facelift 2020 35 TDIvsMercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GLB (X247)
GLB 200
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h9.0 s
- Fastest top speed213 km/h132 mph
- Most powerful163 hp122 kW
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,354 km841 mi
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score43/100
- Best economy score94/100
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200
- Lightest1,480 kg3,263 lb
- Best power-to-weight110 hp/t82 kW/t9.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk570 L
- Best practicality score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 163hp122kW | 163hp122kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,740kg3,836lb | 1,480kg3,263lb |
| Gross weight | 2,420kg5,335lb | 2,085kg4,597lb |
| Top speed | 213 km/h 132 mph | 207 km/h 129 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 96.0s99% target: 211 km/h / 131 mph Calculated | 84.7s99% target: 205 km/h / 127 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 9.0s | 9.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 52.9s Calculated | 59.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.5s Calculated | 8.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.5s Calculated | 16.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 94hp/t70kW/t42hp/1000 lb Calculated | 110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 213Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated | 169Nm/t113lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,354km841mi Calculated | 839km521mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,332cc81cu in |
| Length | 4,682mm184in | 4,634mm182in |
| Width | 1,893mm75in | 1,834mm72in |
| Height | 1,637mm64in | 1,662mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,819mm111in | 2,829mm111in |
| Front track | 1,623mm64in | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,611mm63in | 1,606mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 135mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 520L | 570L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,520L | 1,805L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 52L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 142g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 3,250-4,200 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200 | 5,500 rpm | 1,620-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.5 s | 8.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 9.0 s | 9.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 52.9 s | 59.6 s |
| Top speed | 213 km/h 132 mph | 207 km/h 129 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.9 s | 14.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.5 s | 16.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 139 km/h 86 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 163 hp 122 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200 | 163 hp 122 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200 | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200 | 207 km/h 129 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 9.0 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200 | 9.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI and Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI and Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.7 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200 | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 1,354 km 841 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200 | 839 km 521 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 163 hp 122 kW | 9.0 s | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200 | 163 hp 122 kW | 9.1 s | 207 km/h 129 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200 |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 9.0 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 9.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.7 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200 | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 163 hp 122 kW | 163 hp 122 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 9.0 s | 9.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 213 km/h 132 mph | 207 km/h 129 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,354 km 841 mi | 839 km 521 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 142 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | 570 L 20.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.7 kg/hp | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI | Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.40 LC100 km | 10.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,260 LC/year | 1,628 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI
- Has 120 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 515 km (320 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200
- Is 260 kg lighter
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























