Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) · Facelift 2023
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) · Facelift 2023 GLA 220dvsVolkswagen T-Roc I · Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen T-Roc I · Facelift 2022
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220d
- Fastest top speed219 km/h136 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Largest trunk427 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Lightest1,456 kg3,210 lb
- Best power-to-weight130 hp/t97 kW/t7.7 kg/hp
- Best estimated range873 km542 mi
- Best performance score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,650kg3,638lb | 1,456kg3,210lb |
| Gross weight | 2,225kg4,905lb | 2,040kg4,497lb |
| Top speed | 219 km/h 136 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.4s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 65.5s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.9s Calculated | 32.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 242Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 823km511mi Calculated | 873km542mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,950cc119cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,412mm174in | 4,236mm167in |
| Width | 1,834mm72in | 1,819mm72in |
| Height | 1,616mm64in | 1,582mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,729mm107in | 2,594mm102in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,547mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,606mm63in | 1,552mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 143mm6in | 158mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 427L | 392L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,422L | 1,237L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220d: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | 3,800 rpm | 1,600-2,600 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.9 s | 32.9 s |
| Top speed | 219 km/h 136 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 1,456 kg 3,210 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | 7.5 s |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 6.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220d: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | 823 km 511 mi |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 873 km 542 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.5 s | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 6.8 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 219 km/h 136 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb | 1,456 kg 3,210 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 823 km 511 mi | 873 km 542 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 427 L 15.1 cu ft | 392 L 13.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220d | Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 11.03 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 1,654 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220d
- Has 80 Nm more
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 35 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI
- Is 194 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 50 km (31 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























