Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200vsMercedes-Benz GLA (H247) · Facelift 2023 GLA 200d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GLA (H247) · Facelift 2023
GLA 200d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200
- Quickest 0-100 km/h9.1 s
- Fastest top speed207 km/h129 mph
- Most powerful163 hp122 kW
- Lightest1,480 kg3,263 lb
- Best power-to-weight110 hp/t82 kW/t9.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range839 km521 mi
- Largest trunk570 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score42/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200d
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200 | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 163hp122kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,480kg3,263lb | 1,640kg3,616lb |
| Gross weight | 2,085kg4,597lb | 2,215kg4,883lb |
| Top speed | 207 km/h 129 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.7s99% target: 205 km/h / 127 mph Calculated | 90.5s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 9.1s | 9.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 59.6s Calculated | 70.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.6s Calculated | 8.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 16.6s Calculated | 16.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated | 91hp/t68kW/t41hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 169Nm/t113lb-ft/ton Calculated | 195Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 839km521mi Calculated | 823km511mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,332cc81cu in | 1,950cc119cu in |
| Length | 4,634mm182in | 4,412mm174in |
| Width | 1,834mm72in | 1,834mm72in |
| Height | 1,662mm65in | 1,616mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,829mm111in | 2,729mm107in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,606mm63in | 1,606mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 135mm5in | 143mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 570L | 427L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,805L | 1,422L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 52L | 51L |
| CO2 emissions | 142g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200 | 5,500 rpm | 1,620-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 3,400-4,400 rpm | 1,400-3,200 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200 | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.6 s | 8.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 9.1 s | 9.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 59.6 s | 70.0 s |
| Top speed | 207 km/h 129 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.9 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 14.0 s | 13.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.6 s | 16.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 139 km/h 86 mph | 137 km/h 85 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200 | 163 hp 122 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 150 hp 112 kW |
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200 has 13 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200d.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200d and Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200 | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200 | 207 km/h 129 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200 | 9.1 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 9.1 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200 | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 91 hp/t 68 kW/t 10.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200 | 839 km 521 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 823 km 511 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200 | 163 hp 122 kW | 9.1 s | 207 km/h 129 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 150 hp 112 kW | 9.1 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200 |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 9.1 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 9.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200 | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 91 hp/t 68 kW/t 10.9 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200 | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 163 hp 122 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 9.1 s | 9.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 207 km/h 129 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 839 km 521 mi | 823 km 511 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 142 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 570 L 20.1 cu ft | 427 L 15.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 91 hp/t 68 kW/t 10.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200 | Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 10.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 1,628 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200
- Has 13 hp more
- Is 160 kg lighter
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 16 km (10 mi) more estimated range
- Has 143 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200d
- Has 70 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























