Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200dvsVolkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen T-Roc I
2.0 TDI SCR
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200d
- Fastest top speed208 km/h129 mph
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Largest trunk425 L
- Best overall score55/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.5 s
- Highest torque340 Nm251 lb-ft
- Lightest1,457 kg3,212 lb
- Best power-to-weight103 hp/t77 kW/t9.7 kg/hp
- Best estimated range1,078 km670 mi
- Best performance score44/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 340Nm251lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,540kg3,395lb | 1,457kg3,212lb |
| Gross weight | 2,135kg4,707lb | 2,040kg4,497lb |
| Top speed | 208 km/h 129 mph | 200 km/h 124 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 83.2s99% target: 206 km/h / 128 mph Calculated | 74.9s99% target: 198 km/h / 123 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.6s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 55.6s Calculated | - |
| 0-60 mph | 8.1s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.3s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 97hp/t73kW/t44hp/1000 lb Calculated | 103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated | 233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 896km557mi Calculated | 1,078km670mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,950cc119cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,410mm174in | 4,234mm167in |
| Width | 1,834mm72in | 1,819mm72in |
| Height | 1,611mm63in | 1,573mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,729mm107in | 2,593mm102in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,546mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,606mm63in | 1,547mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 143mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 425L | 392L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,420L | 1,237L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 43L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200d: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 3,400-4,440 rpm | 1,400-3,200 rpm | 4,690 rpm |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | 3,500 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.1 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.6 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 55.6 s | - |
| Top speed | 208 km/h 129 mph | 200 km/h 124 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.7 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.3 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 141 km/h 88 mph | 141 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 150 hp 112 kW |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | 150 hp 112 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | 1,457 kg 3,212 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | 200 km/h 124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 8.6 s |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200d: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 97 hp/t 73 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 896 km 557 mi |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | 1,078 km 670 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.6 s | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.5 s | 200 km/h 124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 97 hp/t 73 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.6 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 208 km/h 129 mph | 200 km/h 124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | 1,457 kg 3,212 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 896 km 557 mi | 1,078 km 670 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | 392 L 13.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 97 hp/t 73 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200d | Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.40 LC100 km | 8.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,260 LC/year | 1,339 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200d
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 33 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 83 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 183 km (113 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























