Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) · Facelift 2023
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) · Facelift 2023 GLA 200vsMercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GLA (H247)
GLA 200d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.9 s
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph
- Most powerful163 hp122 kW
- Lightest1,495 kg3,296 lb
- Best power-to-weight109 hp/t81 kW/t9.2 kg/hp
- Largest trunk425 L
- Best overall score54/100
- Best performance score42/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200d
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range981 km609 mi
- Best economy score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 163hp122kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 270Nm199lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,495kg3,296lb | 1,595kg3,516lb |
| Gross weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | 2,190kg4,828lb |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 88.1s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 84.9s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.9s | 8.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 54.4s Calculated | 66.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.4s Calculated | 8.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.5s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 94hp/t70kW/t43hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 181Nm/t121lb-ft/ton Calculated | 201Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 589km366mi Calculated | 981km609mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,332cc81cu in | 1,950cc119cu in |
| Length | 4,412mm174in | 4,410mm174in |
| Width | 1,834mm72in | 1,834mm72in |
| Height | 1,616mm64in | 1,611mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,729mm107in | 2,729mm107in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,606mm63in | 1,606mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 143mm6in | 143mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 425L | 425L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,420L | 1,420L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 43L | 51L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-3,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 3,400-4,440 rpm | 1,400-3,200 rpm | 4,690 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.4 s | 8.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.9 s | 8.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 54.4 s | 66.0 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.9 s | 13.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.5 s | 16.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 140 km/h 87 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 163 hp 122 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 150 hp 112 kW |
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200 has 13 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200d.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200d and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 8.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 8.9 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200d and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200: 2.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 589 km 366 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 981 km 609 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 163 hp 122 kW | 8.9 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.9 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 163 hp 122 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.9 s | 8.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 589 km 366 mi | 981 km 609 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200 | Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.78 LC100 km | 9.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,916 LC/year | 1,365 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200
- Has 13 hp more
- Is 100 kg lighter
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200d
- Has 50 Nm more
- Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 392 km (243 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























