Volkswagen Touareg II (7P)
Car comparison
Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) 4.2 FSI V8vsMercedes-Benz GL (X166) GL 400
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GL (X166)
GL 400
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) 4.2 FSI V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful360 hp268 kW
- Lightest2,273 kg5,011 lb
- Best power-to-weight158 hp/t118 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score61/100
Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) GL 400
- Highest torque480 Nm354 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,042 km647 mi
- Largest trunk680 L
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 FSI V8 | Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 400 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 360hp268kW | 333hp248kW |
| Torque | 445Nm328lb-ft | 480Nm354lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,273kg5,011lb | 2,360kg5,203lb |
| Gross weight | 2,850kg6,283lb | 3,250kg7,165lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 93.1s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 112.3s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.4s Calculated | 32.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated | 203Nm/t136lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 826km514mi Calculated | 1,042km647mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,163cc254cu in | 2,996cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,795mm189in | 5,120mm202in |
| Width | 1,940mm76in | 1,934mm76in |
| Height | 1,709mm67in | 1,850mm73in |
| Wheelbase | 2,893mm114in | 3,075mm121in |
| Front track | 1,656mm65in | 1,655mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,676mm66in | 1,675mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 201mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 520L | 680L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,642L | 2,300L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 100L | 100L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 225g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) 4.2 FSI V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) GL 400: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 FSI V8 | 6,800 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 400 | 5,250-6,000 rpm | 1,600-4,000 rpm | 6,300 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 FSI V8 | Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 400 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.4 s | 32.5 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 FSI V8 | 360 hp 268 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 400 | 333 hp 248 kW |
Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) 4.2 FSI V8 has 27 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) GL 400.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) GL 400 and Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) 4.2 FSI V8: 27 hp (20 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 FSI V8 | 445 Nm 328 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 400 | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 FSI V8 | 2,273 kg 5,011 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 400 | 2,360 kg 5,203 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 FSI V8 | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 400 | 240 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 FSI V8 | 6.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 400 | 6.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) 4.2 FSI V8 and Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) GL 400: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 FSI V8 | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 400 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) GL 400 and Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) 4.2 FSI V8: 2.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 FSI V8 | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 400 | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 FSI V8 | 826 km 514 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 400 | 1,042 km 647 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 FSI V8 | 360 hp 268 kW | 6.5 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 400 | 333 hp 248 kW | 6.7 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 FSI V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 400 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 FSI V8 |
| 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 400 |
| 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) GL 400 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 FSI V8 | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 400 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 FSI V8 | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 400 | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 FSI V8 | Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 400 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 360 hp 268 kW | 333 hp 248 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 445 Nm 328 lb-ft | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,273 kg 5,011 lb | 2,360 kg 5,203 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 826 km 514 mi | 1,042 km 647 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 225 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | 680 L 24.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) 4.2 FSI V8 | Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) GL 400 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.18 LC100 km | 16.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.08 LC100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,815 L479 US gal399 UK gal | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,176 LC/year | 2,520 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) 4.2 FSI V8
- Has 27 hp more
- Is 87 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) GL 400
- Has 35 Nm more
- Uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 215 km (134 mi) more estimated range
- Has 160 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























