BMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010
Car comparison
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010 M50dvsVolkswagen Touareg II (7P) 4.2 FSI V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Touareg II (7P)
4.2 FSI V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.4 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph
- Most powerful381 hp284 kW
- Highest torque740 Nm546 lb-ft
- Lightest2,225 kg4,905 lb
- Best power-to-weight171 hp/t128 kW/t5.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,133 km704 mi
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score73/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 FSI V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 381hp284kW | 360hp268kW |
| Torque | 740Nm546lb-ft | 445Nm328lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,225kg4,905lb | 2,273kg5,011lb |
| Gross weight | 2,830kg6,239lb | 2,850kg6,283lb |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.3s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 93.1s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.4s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.5s Calculated | 27.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.6s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 171hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated | 158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 333Nm/t223lb-ft/ton Calculated | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,133km704mi Calculated | 826km514mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 4,163cc254cu in |
| Length | 4,857mm191in | 4,795mm189in |
| Width | 2,010mm79in | 1,940mm76in |
| Height | 1,766mm70in | 1,709mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,933mm115in | 2,893mm114in |
| Front track | 1,662mm65in | 1,656mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,702mm67in | 1,676mm66in |
| Ground clearance | - | 201mm8in |
| Trunk volume | - | 520L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,642L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 100L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) 4.2 FSI V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 4,000-4,400 rpm | 2,000-3,000 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 FSI V8 | 6,800 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 FSI V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.1 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.4 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.5 s | 27.4 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.4 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.6 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 381 hp 284 kW |
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 FSI V8 | 360 hp 268 kW |
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d has 21 hp more than Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) 4.2 FSI V8.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) 4.2 FSI V8 and BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d: 21 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 740 Nm 546 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 FSI V8 | 445 Nm 328 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 2,225 kg 4,905 lb |
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 FSI V8 | 2,273 kg 5,011 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 FSI V8 | 245 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 5.4 s |
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 FSI V8 | 6.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d and Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) 4.2 FSI V8: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 FSI V8 | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d and Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) 4.2 FSI V8: 4.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 FSI V8 | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 1,133 km 704 mi |
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 FSI V8 | 826 km 514 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 381 hp 284 kW | 5.4 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 FSI V8 | 360 hp 268 kW | 6.5 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 FSI V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 FSI V8 |
| 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 FSI V8 | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 FSI V8 | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 FSI V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 381 hp 284 kW | 360 hp 268 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 740 Nm 546 lb-ft | 445 Nm 328 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.4 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,225 kg 4,905 lb | 2,273 kg 5,011 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,133 km 704 mi | 826 km 514 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d | Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) 4.2 FSI V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK | 12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.13 LC100 km | 21.18 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi | 34.08 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal | 1,815 L479 US gal399 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,969 LC/year | 3,176 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d
- Has 21 hp more
- Has 295 Nm more
- Is 48 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 4.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 307 km (191 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) 4.2 FSI V8
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























