Volkswagen Arteon
Car comparison
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDIvsMercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz EQS (V297)
EQS 350 100 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Lightest1,828 kg4,030 lb
- Best power-to-weight131 hp/t98 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
- Best performance score60/100
- Best economy score91/100
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh
- Most powerful292 hp218 kW
- Highest torque565 Nm417 lb-ft
- Largest trunk610 L
- Best overall score68/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 292hp218kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 565Nm417lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,828kg4,030lb | 2,315kg5,104lb |
| Gross weight | 2,360kg5,203lb | 2,910kg6,415lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 113.8s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 92.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.5s Calculated | 39.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 131hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 274Nm/t183lb-ft/ton Calculated | 244Nm/t163lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,119km695mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | - |
| Length | 4,862mm191in | 5,216mm205in |
| Width | 1,871mm74in | 1,926mm76in |
| Height | 1,450mm57in | 1,512mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,837mm112in | 3,210mm126in |
| Front track | 1,591mm63in | 1,667mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,581mm62in | 1,682mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 138mm5in | 134mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 563L | 610L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,770L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 152g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.5 s | 39.4 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 95 mph | 149 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | 240 hp 179 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 292 hp 218 kW |
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh has 52 hp more than Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI and Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh: 52 hp (39 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 565 Nm 417 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | 1,828 kg 4,030 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 2,315 kg 5,104 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | 6.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 6.6 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh has more power, Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI and Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.5 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 292 hp 218 kW | 6.6 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 292 hp 218 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 565 Nm 417 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,828 kg 4,030 lb | 2,315 kg 5,104 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,119 km 695 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 152 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 563 L 19.9 cu ft | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI
- Is 487 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh
- Has 52 hp more
- Has 65 Nm more
- Has 47 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























