Car comparison

Toyota Celica (T20) 2.0 TurbovsMercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Toyota Celica (T20)

2.0 Turbo

242 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedLiftback / fastback1994-1999
VS

Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297)

EQS 350 100 kWh

292 hpElectricRWDAutomaticLiftback / fastback2021-2022

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Toyota Celica (T20) 2.0 Turbo

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    250 km/h
    155 mph Unrestricted
    240 km/h
    149 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,390 kg
    3,064 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    174 hp/t
    130 kW/t
    5.7 kg/hp
  • Best economy score
    81/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 TurboMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
Power
242hp180kW
292hp218kW
Torque
302Nm223lb-ft
565Nm417lb-ft
Curb weight
1,390kg3,064lb
2,315kg5,104lb
Gross weight
1,785kg3,935lb
2,910kg6,415lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
91.7s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
92.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.1s
6.6s
0-200 km/h
25.1s
Calculated
39.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.8s
Calculated
6.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
14.3s
Calculated
14.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
174hp/t130kW/t79hp/1000 lb
Calculated
126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton
Calculated
244Nm/t163lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
716km445mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
-
Length
4,420mm174in
5,216mm205in
Width
1,750mm69in
1,926mm76in
Height
1,305mm51in
1,512mm60in
Wheelbase
2,450mm96in
3,210mm126in
Front track
1,510mm59in
1,667mm66in
Rear track
1,490mm59in
1,682mm66in
Ground clearance-
134mm5in
Trunk volume
208L
610L
Max trunk volume-
1,770L
Doors
3
5
Seats
4
5
Fuel tank
68L
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 TurboMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.8 s
6.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.1 s
6.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
25.1 s
39.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.2 s
9.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.0 s
12.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.3 s
14.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
160 km/h
99 mph
149 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo
242 hp
180 kW
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
292 hp
218 kW

Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh has 50 hp more than Toyota Celica (T20) 2.0 Turbo.

The biggest power difference is between Toyota Celica (T20) 2.0 Turbo and Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh: 50 hp (37 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo
302 Nm
223 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
565 Nm
417 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo
1,390 kg
3,064 lb
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
2,315 kg
5,104 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh has more power, Toyota Celica (T20) 2.0 Turbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Toyota Celica (T20) 2.0 Turbo and Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh: 0.5 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo
174 hp/t
130 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo
242 hp
180 kW
6.1 s
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
292 hp
218 kW
6.6 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo
Power
242 hp
180 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
208 L
7.3 cu ft
Length
4,420 mm
174.0 in
Height
1,305 mm
51.4 in
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
Power
292 hp
218 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
5,216 mm
205.4 in
Height
1,512 mm
59.5 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 TurboMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
Power
242 hp
180 kW
292 hp
218 kW
Torque
302 Nm
223 lb-ft
565 Nm
417 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.1 s
6.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
1,390 kg
3,064 lb
2,315 kg
5,104 lb
Fuel consumption
9.5 L/100 km
24.8 mpg US
29.7 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
208 L
7.3 cu ft
Length
4,420 mm
174.0 in
Height
1,305 mm
51.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
5,216 mm
205.4 in
Height
1,512 mm
59.5 in
Range score
716 km
445 mi
-
Trunk score
208 L
7.3 cu ft
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
174 hp/t
130 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleToyota Celica (T20) 2.0 Turbo
Consumption9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.63 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi26.76 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,425 L376 US gal313 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,494 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Toyota Celica (T20) 2.0 Turbo

  • Is 925 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 48 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Toyota Celica (T20) 2.0 Turbo
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Toyota Celica (T20) 2.0 Turbo vs Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster