Toyota Celica (T20)
Car comparison
Toyota Celica (T20) 2.0 TurbovsMercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz EQS (V297)
EQS 350 100 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh
- Most powerful292 hp218 kW
- Highest torque565 Nm417 lb-ft
- Largest trunk610 L
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score60/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Toyota Celica (T20) 2.0 Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.1 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,390 kg3,064 lb
- Best power-to-weight174 hp/t130 kW/t5.7 kg/hp
- Best economy score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 242hp180kW | 292hp218kW |
| Torque | 302Nm223lb-ft | 565Nm417lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,390kg3,064lb | 2,315kg5,104lb |
| Gross weight | 1,785kg3,935lb | 2,910kg6,415lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 91.7s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 92.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.1s Calculated | 39.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.3s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 174hp/t130kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated | 244Nm/t163lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 716km445mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | - |
| Length | 4,420mm174in | 5,216mm205in |
| Width | 1,750mm69in | 1,926mm76in |
| Height | 1,305mm51in | 1,512mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,450mm96in | 3,210mm126in |
| Front track | 1,510mm59in | 1,667mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,490mm59in | 1,682mm66in |
| Ground clearance | - | 134mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 208L | 610L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,770L |
| Doors | 3 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.1 s | 39.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.3 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 99 mph | 149 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo | 242 hp 180 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 292 hp 218 kW |
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh has 50 hp more than Toyota Celica (T20) 2.0 Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Toyota Celica (T20) 2.0 Turbo and Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh: 50 hp (37 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo | 302 Nm 223 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 565 Nm 417 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 2,315 kg 5,104 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo | 6.1 s |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 6.6 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh has more power, Toyota Celica (T20) 2.0 Turbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Toyota Celica (T20) 2.0 Turbo and Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo | 242 hp 180 kW | 6.1 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 292 hp 218 kW | 6.6 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 242 hp 180 kW | 292 hp 218 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 302 Nm 223 lb-ft | 565 Nm 417 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb | 2,315 kg 5,104 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 716 km 445 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 208 L 7.3 cu ft | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Toyota Celica (T20) 2.0 Turbo |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.76 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,425 L376 US gal313 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,494 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Toyota Celica (T20) 2.0 Turbo
- Is 925 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Has 48 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh
- Has 50 hp more
- Has 263 Nm more
- Has 402 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























