Car comparison

Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSIvsMercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Superb III

2.0 TSI

220 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedLiftback / fastback2015-2018
VS

Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297)

EQS 350 100 kWh

292 hpElectricRWDAutomaticLiftback / fastback2021-2022

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI

  • Fastest top speed
    245 km/h
    152 mph
  • Lightest
    1,430 kg
    3,153 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    154 hp/t
    115 kW/t
    6.5 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    625 L
  • Best economy score
    90/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaSuperb III2.0 TSIMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
Power
220hp164kW
292hp218kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
565Nm417lb-ft
Curb weight
1,430kg3,153lb
2,315kg5,104lb
Gross weight
2,080kg4,586lb
2,910kg6,415lb
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
118.5s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph
Calculated
92.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.0s
6.6s
0-200 km/h
32.2s
Calculated
39.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.6s
Calculated
6.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption city
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.0s
Calculated
14.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb
Calculated
126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
245Nm/t164lb-ft/ton
Calculated
244Nm/t163lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,031km641mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
-
Length
4,861mm191in
5,216mm205in
Width
1,864mm73in
1,926mm76in
Height
1,468mm58in
1,512mm60in
Wheelbase
2,841mm112in
3,210mm126in
Front track
1,586mm62in
1,667mm66in
Rear track
1,574mm62in
1,682mm66in
Ground clearance
149mm6in
134mm5in
Trunk volume
625L
610L
Max trunk volume
1,760L
1,770L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
-
CO2 emissions
146g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaSuperb III2.0 TSIMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.6 s
6.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.0 s
6.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
32.2 s
39.4 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
9.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.6 s
12.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.0 s
14.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
150 km/h
93 mph
149 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI
220 hp
164 kW
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
292 hp
218 kW

Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh has 72 hp more than Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI and Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh: 72 hp (54 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
565 Nm
417 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI
1,430 kg
3,153 lb
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
2,315 kg
5,104 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI
245 km/h
152 mph
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh and Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI: 0.4 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI
220 hp
164 kW
7.0 s
245 km/h
152 mph
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
292 hp
218 kW
6.6 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
625 L
22.1 cu ft
Length
4,861 mm
191.4 in
Height
1,468 mm
57.8 in
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
Power
292 hp
218 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
5,216 mm
205.4 in
Height
1,512 mm
59.5 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaSuperb III2.0 TSIMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
Power
220 hp
164 kW
292 hp
218 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
565 Nm
417 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.0 s
6.6 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
1,430 kg
3,153 lb
2,315 kg
5,104 lb
Fuel consumption
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
625 L
22.1 cu ft
Length
4,861 mm
191.4 in
Height
1,468 mm
57.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
5,216 mm
205.4 in
Height
1,512 mm
59.5 in
Range score
1,031 km
641 mi
-
CO2 score
146 g/km
-
Trunk score
625 L
22.1 cu ft
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Superb III 2.0 TSI
Consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.20 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.02 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used960 L254 US gal211 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,680 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI

  • Is 885 kg lighter
  • Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 15 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power

Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh

  • Has 72 hp more
  • Has 215 Nm more
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI vs Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster