Skoda Superb III
Car comparison
Skoda Superb III 1.8 TSIvsMercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz EQS (V297)
EQS 350 100 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Superb III 1.8 TSI
- Fastest top speed232 km/h144 mph
- Lightest1,410 kg3,109 lb
- Best power-to-weight128 hp/t95 kW/t7.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk625 L
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Most powerful292 hp218 kW
- Highest torque565 Nm417 lb-ft
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score60/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaSuperb III1.8 TSI | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 292hp218kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 565Nm417lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,410kg3,109lb | 2,315kg5,104lb |
| Gross weight | 2,035kg4,486lb | 2,910kg6,415lb |
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 128.2s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph Calculated | 92.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.1s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 42.3s Calculated | 39.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.6s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 128hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 177Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated | 244Nm/t163lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,119km695mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,798cc110cu in | - |
| Length | 4,861mm191in | 5,216mm205in |
| Width | 1,864mm73in | 1,926mm76in |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,512mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,841mm112in | 3,210mm126in |
| Front track | 1,584mm62in | 1,667mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,572mm62in | 1,682mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 149mm6in | 134mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 625L | 610L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,760L | 1,770L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 134g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaSuperb III1.8 TSI | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.6 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.1 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 42.3 s | 39.4 s |
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 141 km/h 88 mph | 149 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III1.8 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 292 hp 218 kW |
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh has 112 hp more than Skoda Superb III 1.8 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Superb III 1.8 TSI and Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh: 112 hp (84 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III1.8 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 565 Nm 417 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III1.8 TSI | 1,410 kg 3,109 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 2,315 kg 5,104 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III1.8 TSI | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III1.8 TSI | 8.1 s |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 6.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh and Skoda Superb III 1.8 TSI: 1.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III1.8 TSI | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III1.8 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.1 s | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 292 hp 218 kW | 6.6 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III1.8 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaSuperb III1.8 TSI | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 292 hp 218 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 565 Nm 417 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.1 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,410 kg 3,109 lb | 2,315 kg 5,104 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,119 km 695 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 134 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 625 L 22.1 cu ft | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Superb III 1.8 TSI |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Superb III 1.8 TSI
- Is 905 kg lighter
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 15 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh
- Has 112 hp more
- Has 315 Nm more
- Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























