Tesla Model S · Facelift 2016
Performance 100 kWh
611 hpElectricAWDAutomaticLiftback / fastback2019-2021
Car comparison
Tesla Model S · Facelift 2016 Performance 100 kWhvsMercedes-Benz EQS (V297) · Facelift 2024 AMG EQS 53 125 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) · Facelift 2024
AMG EQS 53 125 kWh
761 hpElectricAWDAutomaticLiftback / fastback2024-2025
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 Performance 100 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.5 s
- Fastest top speed261 km/h162 mph
- Lightest2,253 kg4,967 lb
- Largest trunk745 L
- Best overall score88/100
- Best performance score88/100
- Best economy score0/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) Facelift 2024 AMG EQS 53 125 kWh
- Most powerful761 hp567 kW
- Highest torque1,020 Nm752 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight288 hp/t215 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2024AMG EQS 53 125 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 611hp456kW | 761hp567kW |
| Torque | 967Nm713lb-ft | 1,020Nm752lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,253kg4,967lb | 2,640kg5,820lb |
| Gross weight | 2,720kg5,997lb | 3,225kg7,110lb |
| Top speed | 261 km/h 162 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 34.9s99% target: 258 km/h / 161 mph Calculated | 46.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.5s | 3.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.1s Calculated | 12.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.4s Calculated | 3.2s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 10.3s Calculated | 11.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 271hp/t202kW/t123hp/1000 lb Calculated | 288hp/t215kW/t131hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 429Nm/t287lb-ft/ton Calculated | 386Nm/t259lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 4,970mm196in | 5,223mm206in |
| Width | 1,964mm77in | 1,926mm76in |
| Height | 1,445mm57in | 1,520mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,960mm117in | 3,210mm126in |
| Front track | 1,662mm65in | 1,660mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,700mm67in | 1,653mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 160mm6in | 139mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 745L | 620L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,645L | 1,700L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2024AMG EQS 53 125 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.4 s | 3.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.5 s | 3.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.1 s | 12.2 s |
| Top speed | 261 km/h 162 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.6 s | 1.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.3 s | 4.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.6 s | 7.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.6 s | 9.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.3 s | 11.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 210 km/h 130 mph | 195 km/h 121 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh | 611 hp 456 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2024AMG EQS 53 125 kWh | 761 hp 567 kW |
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) Facelift 2024 AMG EQS 53 125 kWh has 150 hp more than Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 Performance 100 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 Performance 100 kWh and Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) Facelift 2024 AMG EQS 53 125 kWh: 150 hp (112 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh | 967 Nm 713 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2024AMG EQS 53 125 kWh | 1,020 Nm 752 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh | 2,253 kg 4,967 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2024AMG EQS 53 125 kWh | 2,640 kg 5,820 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh | 261 km/h 162 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2024AMG EQS 53 125 kWh | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh | 2.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2024AMG EQS 53 125 kWh | 3.4 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) Facelift 2024 AMG EQS 53 125 kWh has more power, Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 Performance 100 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 Performance 100 kWh and Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) Facelift 2024 AMG EQS 53 125 kWh: 0.9 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh | 271 hp/t 202 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2024AMG EQS 53 125 kWh | 288 hp/t 215 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh | 611 hp 456 kW | 2.5 s | 261 km/h 162 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2024AMG EQS 53 125 kWh | 761 hp 567 kW | 3.4 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2024AMG EQS 53 125 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2024AMG EQS 53 125 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 611 hp 456 kW | 761 hp 567 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 967 Nm 713 lb-ft | 1,020 Nm 752 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.5 s | 3.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 261 km/h 162 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,253 kg 4,967 lb | 2,640 kg 5,820 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 745 L 26.3 cu ft | 620 L 21.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 271 hp/t 202 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 288 hp/t 215 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 Performance 100 kWh
- Is 387 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 125 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) Facelift 2024 AMG EQS 53 125 kWh
- Has 150 hp more
- Has 53 Nm more
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Tesla Model S Performance 100 kWh
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) AMG EQS 53 125 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected
Popular comparisons
TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWhvsTeslaModel SFacelift 2021Long Range 100 kWh
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2024AMG EQS 53 125 kWhvsMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)AMG EQS 53 120 kWh
TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWhvsTeslaModel SP90D 90 kWh
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2024AMG EQS 53 125 kWhvsMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2026EQS 580 122 kWh
TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWhvsAston MartinRapide E65 kWh
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2024AMG EQS 53 125 kWhvsAUDIE5 Sportback100 kWh
TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWhvsAUDIRS7 Sportback (C8)4.0 TFSI V8
TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWhvsAston MartinRapide AMR6.0 V12
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2024AMG EQS 53 125 kWhvsLotusEmeya102 kWh
TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWhvsMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2024AMG EQS 53 125 kWh
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2024AMG EQS 53 125 kWhvsTeslaModel SFacelift 2016P100D 100 kWh
TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWhvsAUDIRS5 Sportback (F5)2.9 TFSI V6