Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) · Facelift 2024
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) · Facelift 2024 AMG EQS 53 125 kWhvsTesla Cybertruck Cyberbeast 123 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonTesla Cybertruck
Cyberbeast 123 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) Facelift 2024 AMG EQS 53 125 kWh
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest2,640 kg5,820 lb
- Best power-to-weight288 hp/t215 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Best overall score85/100
- Best performance score85/100
- Best economy score0/100
Tesla Cybertruck Cyberbeast 123 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.7 s
- Most powerful845 hp630 kW
- Largest trunk1,591 L
- Best practicality score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2024AMG EQS 53 125 kWh | TeslaCybertruckCyberbeast 123 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 761hp567kW | 845hp630kW |
| Torque | 1,020Nm752lb-ft | - |
| Curb weight | 2,640kg5,820lb | 3,129kg6,898lb |
| Gross weight | 3,225kg7,110lb | 4,159kg9,169lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 46.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 32.7s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.4s | 2.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.2s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.2s Calculated | 2.5s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 11.4s Calculated | 11.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 288hp/t215kW/t131hp/1000 lb Calculated | 270hp/t201kW/t122hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 386Nm/t259lb-ft/ton Calculated | - |
| Length | 5,223mm206in | 5,683mm224in |
| Width | 1,926mm76in | 2,032mm80in |
| Height | 1,520mm60in | 1,946mm77in |
| Wheelbase | 3,210mm126in | 3,635mm143in |
| Front track | 1,660mm65in | 1,772mm70in |
| Rear track | 1,653mm65in | 1,772mm70in |
| Ground clearance | 139mm5in | 406mm16in |
| Trunk volume | 620L | 1,591L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,700L | 3,421L |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2024AMG EQS 53 125 kWh | TeslaCybertruckCyberbeast 123 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.2 s | 2.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.4 s | 2.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.2 s | 16.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 1.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.9 s | 4.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.4 s | 6.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.6 s | 9.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.4 s | 11.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 195 km/h 121 mph | 184 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2024AMG EQS 53 125 kWh | 761 hp 567 kW |
| TeslaCybertruckCyberbeast 123 kWh | 845 hp 630 kW |
Tesla Cybertruck Cyberbeast 123 kWh has 84 hp more than Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) Facelift 2024 AMG EQS 53 125 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) Facelift 2024 AMG EQS 53 125 kWh and Tesla Cybertruck Cyberbeast 123 kWh: 84 hp (63 kW).
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2024AMG EQS 53 125 kWh | 2,640 kg 5,820 lb |
| TeslaCybertruckCyberbeast 123 kWh | 3,129 kg 6,898 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2024AMG EQS 53 125 kWh | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| TeslaCybertruckCyberbeast 123 kWh | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2024AMG EQS 53 125 kWh | 3.4 s |
| TeslaCybertruckCyberbeast 123 kWh | 2.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Tesla Cybertruck Cyberbeast 123 kWh and Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) Facelift 2024 AMG EQS 53 125 kWh: 0.7 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2024AMG EQS 53 125 kWh | 288 hp/t 215 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| TeslaCybertruckCyberbeast 123 kWh | 270 hp/t 201 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2024AMG EQS 53 125 kWh | 761 hp 567 kW | 3.4 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| TeslaCybertruckCyberbeast 123 kWh | 845 hp 630 kW | 2.7 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2024AMG EQS 53 125 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| TeslaCybertruckCyberbeast 123 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2024AMG EQS 53 125 kWh | TeslaCybertruckCyberbeast 123 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 761 hp 567 kW | 845 hp 630 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,020 Nm 752 lb-ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.4 s | 2.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,640 kg 5,820 lb | 3,129 kg 6,898 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 620 L 21.9 cu ft | 1,591 L 56.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 288 hp/t 215 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 270 hp/t 201 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) Facelift 2024 AMG EQS 53 125 kWh
- Is 489 kg lighter
- Has 45 km/h (28 mph) higher top speed
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Tesla Cybertruck Cyberbeast 123 kWh
- Has 84 hp more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 971 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























