Car comparison

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 D4vsMercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013

2.0 D4

190 hp1969 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2015-2018
VS

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213)

E 200

184 hp1991 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2016-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    117 hp/t
    87 kW/t
    8.6 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.1 L/100 km
    57.4 mpg US
    68.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.0 L/100 km
    47.0 mpg US
    56.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    3.6 L/100 km
    65.3 mpg US
    78.5 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,646 km
    1,023 mi
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    53/100
  • Best economy score
    96/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200
Power
190hp142kW
184hp137kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
300Nm221lb-ft
Curb weight
1,626kg3,585lb
1,590kg3,505lb
Gross weight
2,110kg4,652lb
2,305kg5,082lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
233 km/h
145 mph
To 99% top speed
74.7s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
73.1s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.6s
7.9s
0-200 km/h
27.3s
Calculated
29.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.2s
Calculated
7.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
3.6L/100 km65.3mpg US78.5mpg UK
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.4s
Calculated
15.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
116hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
246Nm/t165lb-ft/ton
Calculated
189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,646km1,023mi
Calculated
685km426mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,991cc121cu in
Length
4,635mm182in
4,923mm194in
Width
1,865mm73in
1,852mm73in
Height
1,484mm58in
1,468mm58in
Wheelbase
2,776mm109in
2,939mm116in
Front track
1,588mm63in
-
Rear track
1,585mm62in
1,619mm64in
Ground clearance
136mm5in
-
Trunk volume
380L
540L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
68L
50L
CO2 emissions-
162g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200PowerTorque
  • Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
  • Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D44,250 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm5,000 rpm
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 2005,500 rpm1,200-4,000 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.2 s
7.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.6 s
7.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
27.3 s
29.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
233 km/h
145 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
10.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.1 s
13.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.4 s
15.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
156 km/h
97 mph
153 km/h
95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200
184 hp
137 kW

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 has 6 hp more than Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200 and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4: 6 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200
300 Nm
221 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
1,626 kg
3,585 lb
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200
1,590 kg
3,505 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200
233 km/h
145 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D47.6 s
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 2007.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
4.1 L/100 km
57.4 mpg US
68.9 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200: 3.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200
116 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
1,646 km
1,023 mi
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200
685 km
426 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW
7.6 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200
184 hp
137 kW
7.9 s
233 km/h
145 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,923 mm
193.8 in
Height
1,468 mm
57.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
4.1 L/100 km
57.4 mpg US
68.9 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
4.1 L/100 km
57.4 mpg US
68.9 mpg UK
7.6 s
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
7.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
4.1 L/100 km
57.4 mpg US
68.9 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200
116 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200
Power
190 hp
142 kW
184 hp
137 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.6 s
7.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
233 km/h
145 mph
Lightness
1,626 kg
3,585 lb
1,590 kg
3,505 lb
Fuel consumption
4.1 L/100 km
57.4 mpg US
68.9 mpg UK
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,923 mm
193.8 in
Height
1,468 mm
57.8 in
Range score
1,646 km
1,023 mi
685 km
426 mi
CO2 score
-
162 g/km
Trunk score
380 L
13.4 cu ft
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
116 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200
Consumption4.1 L/100 km57.4 mpg US68.9 mpg UK7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km7.17 LC100 km12.78 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi11.55 LC100 mi20.56 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used615 L162 US gal135 UK gal1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,076 LC/year1,916 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4

  • Has 6 hp more
  • Has 100 Nm more
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 3.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 961 km (597 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200

  • Is 36 kg lighter
  • Has 160 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo S60 II 2.0 D4
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 D4
2.4 D5
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4vsVolvoS60 II2.4 D5
E 200
E 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200
2.0 D4
2.4i T5 20V
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4vsVolvoS602.4i T5 20V
E 200
E 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 220d
2.0 D4
2.0 D4
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4vsVolvoS902.0 D4
E 200
E 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 220d
2.0 D4
2.0 TDI
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4vsVolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TDI
E 200
E 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200vsMercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 200
2.0 D4
2.0d
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4vsJaguarXE (X760)2.0d
E 200
E 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200vsMercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)Facelift 2013E 200
2.0 D4
2.0d
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4vsJaguarXF (X260)2.0d
E 200
E 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200vsMercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)Facelift 2020E 220d
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 vs Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200 - car comparison - FastVsFaster