Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) · Facelift 2013
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) · Facelift 2013 E 200vsMercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz E-class (W213)
E 200
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 200
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Fastest top speed233 km/h145 mph
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Lightest1,580 kg3,483 lb
- Best power-to-weight116 hp/t87 kW/t8.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range967 km601 mi
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200 | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,580kg3,483lb | 1,590kg3,505lb |
| Gross weight | 2,210kg4,872lb | 2,305kg5,082lb |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.2s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated | 73.1s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.4s Calculated | 29.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 116hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 190Nm/t127lb-ft/ton Calculated | 189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 967km601mi Calculated | 685km426mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,991cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,879mm192in | 4,923mm194in |
| Width | 1,854mm73in | 1,852mm73in |
| Height | 1,474mm58in | 1,468mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,874mm113in | 2,939mm116in |
| Front track | 1,598mm63in | - |
| Rear track | 1,614mm64in | 1,619mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 540L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 59L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 162g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 200: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200 | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.4 s | 29.6 s |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 95 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200 | 184 hp 137 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 184 hp 137 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200 | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200 | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 233 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200 | 7.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 7.9 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200 | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 200 and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200 | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200 | 967 km 601 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 685 km 426 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.9 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.9 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200 |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 200 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200 | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200 | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200 | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 967 km 601 mi | 685 km 426 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 162 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 200 | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.67 LC100 km | 12.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,601 LC/year | 1,916 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 200
- Is 10 kg lighter
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 282 km (175 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























