Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200vsVolvo S90 2.0 T4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S90
2.0 T4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed232 km/h144 mph
- Most powerful197 hp147 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,679 kg3,702 lb
- Best power-to-weight117 hp/t87 kW/t8.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Volvo S90 2.0 T4
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range821 km510 mi
- Best economy score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | VolvoS902.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 197hp147kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,679kg3,702lb | 1,831kg4,037lb |
| Gross weight | 2,414kg5,322lb | - |
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 70.8s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph Calculated | 78.2s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 8.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.9s Calculated | 35.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 104hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 191Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated | 164Nm/t110lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 694km432mi Calculated | 821km510mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,923mm194in | 4,963mm195in |
| Width | 1,852mm73in | 1,879mm74in |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,443mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,939mm116in | 2,941mm116in |
| Front track | - | 1,628mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,619mm64in | 1,629mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 152mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 500L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 155g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200: Power / Torque
- Volvo S90 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 5,500 rpm | 1,650-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 5,000 rpm | 1,700-4,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | VolvoS902.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.9 s | 35.5 s |
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 197 hp 147 kW |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200 has 7 hp more than Volvo S90 2.0 T4.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S90 2.0 T4 and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 1,679 kg 3,702 lb |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 1,831 kg 4,037 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 7.6 s |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 8.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200 and Volvo S90 2.0 T4: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S90 2.0 T4 and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 694 km 432 mi |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 821 km 510 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 197 hp 147 kW | 7.6 s | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.7 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS902.0 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS902.0 T4 |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | VolvoS902.0 T4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 197 hp 147 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 8.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,679 kg 3,702 lb | 1,831 kg 4,037 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 694 km 432 mi | 821 km 510 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 155 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200 | Volvo S90 2.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.60 LC100 km | 11.73 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,890 LC/year | 1,759 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 152 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 40 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Volvo S90 2.0 T4
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 126 km (79 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























