Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) · Facelift 2013
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) · Facelift 2013 E 300 V6vsToyota Camry VII (XV50) 3.5 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonToyota Camry VII (XV50)
3.5 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 300 V6
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful252 hp188 kW
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Toyota Camry VII (XV50) 3.5 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Highest torque346 Nm255 lb-ft
- Lightest1,615 kg3,560 lb
- Best power-to-weight154 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 300 V6 | ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 252hp188kW | 249hp186kW |
| Torque | 340Nm251lb-ft | 346Nm255lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,750kg3,858lb | 1,615kg3,560lb |
| Gross weight | 2,390kg5,269lb | 2,100kg4,630lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.5s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 56.2s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.0s Calculated | 31.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 194Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 787km489mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,498cc213cu in | 3,456cc211cu in |
| Length | 4,879mm192in | 4,825mm190in |
| Width | 1,854mm73in | 1,825mm72in |
| Height | 1,474mm58in | 1,480mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,874mm113in | 2,775mm109in |
| Front track | 1,598mm63in | 1,575mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,614mm64in | 1,565mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 160mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 506L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 59L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 300 V6: Power / Torque
- Toyota Camry VII (XV50) 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 300 V6 | 6,500 rpm | 3,500-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)3.5 V6 | 6,200 rpm | 4,700 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 300 V6 | ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.0 s | 31.9 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 300 V6 | 252 hp 188 kW |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)3.5 V6 | 249 hp 186 kW |
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 300 V6 has 3 hp more than Toyota Camry VII (XV50) 3.5 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Toyota Camry VII (XV50) 3.5 V6 and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 300 V6: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 300 V6 | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)3.5 V6 | 346 Nm 255 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 300 V6 | 1,750 kg 3,858 lb |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)3.5 V6 | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 300 V6 | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)3.5 V6 | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 300 V6 | 7.4 s |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)3.5 V6 | 7.1 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 300 V6 has more power, Toyota Camry VII (XV50) 3.5 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Toyota Camry VII (XV50) 3.5 V6 and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 300 V6: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 300 V6 | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)3.5 V6 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 300 V6 | 252 hp 188 kW | 7.4 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)3.5 V6 | 249 hp 186 kW | 7.1 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 300 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)3.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 300 V6 | ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)3.5 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 252 hp 188 kW | 249 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | 346 Nm 255 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,750 kg 3,858 lb | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 787 km 489 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 506 L 17.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 300 V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,969 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 300 V6
- Has 3 hp more
- Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Has 34 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Toyota Camry VII (XV50) 3.5 V6
- Has 6 Nm more
- Is 135 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























