Car comparison

Seat Exeo · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSIvsMercedes-Benz E-class (W212) · Facelift 2013 E 250

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Seat Exeo · Facelift 2011

2.0 TSI

211 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSedan2011-2012
VS

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) · Facelift 2013

E 250

211 hp1991 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2013-2016

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    244 km/h
    152 mph
  • Most powerful
    211 hp
    157 kW
  • Lightest
    1,430 kg
    3,153 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    148 hp/t
    110 kW/t
    6.8 kg/hp
  • Best estimated range
    1,014 km
    630 mi
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    55/100

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250

  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.1 L/100 km
    38.6 mpg US
    46.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.7 L/100 km
    30.5 mpg US
    36.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    540 L
  • Best economy score
    90/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSIMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250
Power
211hp157kW
211hp157kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,430kg3,153lb
1,605kg3,538lb
Gross weight
1,990kg4,387lb
2,245kg4,949lb
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
243 km/h
151 mph
To 99% top speed
65.5s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph
Calculated
70.3s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.1s
7.4s
0-200 km/h
23.8s
Calculated
25.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.8s
Calculated
7.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.0s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
131hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton
Calculated
218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,014km630mi
Calculated
967km601mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,991cc121cu in
Length
4,661mm184in
4,879mm192in
Width
1,772mm70in
1,854mm73in
Height
1,430mm56in
1,474mm58in
Wheelbase
2,642mm104in
2,874mm113in
Front track
1,522mm60in
1,598mm63in
Rear track
1,523mm60in
1,614mm64in
Trunk volume
460L
540L
Max trunk volume
833L
-
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
59L
CO2 emissions
159g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSIMercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250PowerTorque
  • Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI4,600-6,000 rpm1,500-4,600 rpm6,250 rpm
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 2505,500 rpm1,200-4,000 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSIMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.8 s
7.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.1 s
7.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.8 s
25.4 s
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
243 km/h
151 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.7 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.0 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
162 km/h
101 mph
159 km/h
99 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
211 hp
157 kW
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250
211 hp
157 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
1,430 kg
3,153 lb
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250
1,605 kg
3,538 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
244 km/h
152 mph
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250
243 km/h
151 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI7.1 s
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 2507.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 and Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: 0.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
148 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
1,014 km
630 mi
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250
967 km
601 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
211 hp
157 kW
7.1 s
244 km/h
152 mph
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250
211 hp
157 kW
7.4 s
243 km/h
151 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,661 mm
183.5 in
Height
1,430 mm
56.3 in
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,879 mm
192.1 in
Height
1,474 mm
58.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK

Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
7.1 s
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
7.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
148 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSIMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250
Power
211 hp
157 kW
211 hp
157 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.1 s
7.4 s
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
243 km/h
151 mph
Lightness
1,430 kg
3,153 lb
1,605 kg
3,538 lb
Fuel consumption
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,661 mm
183.5 in
Height
1,430 mm
56.3 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,879 mm
192.1 in
Height
1,474 mm
58.0 in
Range score
1,014 km
630 mi
967 km
601 mi
CO2 score
159 g/km
-
Trunk score
460 L
16.2 cu ft
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
148 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSeat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSIMercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250
Consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.08 LC100 km10.67 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.43 LC100 mi17.18 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal915 L242 US gal201 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,811 LC/year1,601 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI

  • Is 175 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 47 km (29 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) E 250
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatExeo2.0 TSI
E 250
E 250
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 250
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
E 250
E 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 220d
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
E 250
E 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200
2.0 TSI
2.4 D5
VS
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsVolvoS60 II2.4 D5
E 250
E 250
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250vsMercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)Facelift 2013E 250
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsVolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI
E 250
E 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250vsMercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 220d
2.0 TSI
2.5 T5
VS
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsVolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5
E 250
E 500 BlueEFFICIENCY V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)E 500 BlueEFFICIENCY V8
Seat Exeo · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI vs Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) · Facelift 2013 E 250 - car comparison - FastVsFaster