Seat Exeo · Facelift 2011
Car comparison
Seat Exeo · Facelift 2011 2.0 TDIvsMercedes-Benz E-class (W212) · Facelift 2013 E 220 BlueTEC
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz E-class (W212) · Facelift 2013
E 220 BlueTEC
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 220 BlueTEC
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk490 L
- Best overall score57/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.4 s
- Fastest top speed229 km/h142 mph
- Most powerful170 hp127 kW
- Lightest1,455 kg3,208 lb
- Best power-to-weight117 hp/t87 kW/t8.6 kg/hp
- Best estimated range1,296 km805 mi
- Best performance score48/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 220 BlueTEC |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 170hp127kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,455kg3,208lb | 1,660kg3,660lb |
| Gross weight | 2,015kg4,442lb | 2,320kg5,115lb |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.3s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 78.8s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.4s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.1s Calculated | 34.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated | 241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,296km805mi Calculated | 1,204km748mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 2,143cc131cu in |
| Length | 4,661mm184in | 4,879mm192in |
| Width | 1,772mm70in | 1,854mm73in |
| Height | 1,430mm56in | 1,474mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,642mm104in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,522mm60in | 1,598mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,523mm60in | 1,614mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 490L |
| Max trunk volume | 833L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 59L |
| CO2 emissions | 142g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 220 BlueTEC: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 4,200 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 220 BlueTEC | 3,000-4,200 rpm | 1,400-2,800 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 220 BlueTEC |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.4 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.1 s | 34.1 s |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.3 s | 7.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.7 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 170 hp 127 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 220 BlueTEC | 170 hp 127 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 220 BlueTEC | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 220 BlueTEC | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 220 BlueTEC | 228 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 8.4 s |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 220 BlueTEC | 8.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 220 BlueTEC: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 220 BlueTEC | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 220 BlueTEC and Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 220 BlueTEC | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 1,296 km 805 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 220 BlueTEC | 1,204 km 748 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.4 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 220 BlueTEC | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.6 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 220 BlueTEC |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 220 BlueTEC |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 220 BlueTEC is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 220 BlueTEC | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 220 BlueTEC | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 220 BlueTEC | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 170 hp 127 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.4 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,296 km 805 mi | 1,204 km 748 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 142 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 490 L 17.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 220 BlueTEC |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.45 LC100 km | 8.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,418 LC/year | 1,286 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI
- Is 205 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 92 km (57 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 220 BlueTEC
- Has 50 Nm more
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























