Mercedes-Benz E-class (W210) · Facelift 1999
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W210) · Facelift 1999 AMG E 55 V8vsMercedes-Benz E-class (W212) · Facelift 2013 E 250 CDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz E-class (W212) · Facelift 2013
E 250 CDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W210) Facelift 1999 AMG E 55 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful354 hp264 kW
- Highest torque530 Nm391 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight200 hp/t149 kW/t5.0 kg/hp
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score70/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 CDI
- Lightest1,700 kg3,748 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,157 km719 mi
- Best economy score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 354hp264kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 530Nm391lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,770kg3,902lb | 1,700kg3,748lb |
| Gross weight | 2,280kg5,027lb | 2,330kg5,137lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 58.2s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 72.5s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.6s Calculated | 26.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.2L/100 km12.9mpg US15.5mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 200hp/t149kW/t91hp/1000 lb Calculated | 120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 299Nm/t200lb-ft/ton Calculated | 294Nm/t197lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 640km398mi Calculated | 1,157km719mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,439cc332cu in | 2,143cc131cu in |
| Length | 4,818mm190in | 4,879mm192in |
| Width | 1,799mm71in | 1,854mm73in |
| Height | 1,411mm56in | 1,474mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,833mm112in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,560mm61in | 1,598mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,543mm61in | 1,614mm64in |
| Trunk volume | - | 540L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 59L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W210) Facelift 1999 AMG E 55 V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 CDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI | 3,800 rpm | 1,600-1,800 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.6 s | 26.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 177 km/h 110 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | 354 hp 264 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI | 204 hp 152 kW |
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W210) Facelift 1999 AMG E 55 V8 has 150 hp more than Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 CDI.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 CDI and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W210) Facelift 1999 AMG E 55 V8: 150 hp (112 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI | 242 km/h 150 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | 5.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W210) Facelift 1999 AMG E 55 V8 and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 CDI: 1.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 CDI and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W210) Facelift 1999 AMG E 55 V8: 7.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | 200 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | 640 km 398 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI | 1,157 km 719 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | 354 hp 264 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.5 s | 242 km/h 150 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 |
| 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W210) Facelift 1999 AMG E 55 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | 200 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 354 hp 264 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 242 km/h 150 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 640 km 398 mi | 1,157 km 719 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 200 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W210) Facelift 1999 AMG E 55 V8 | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 CDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.88 LC100 km | 8.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 35.20 LC100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,875 L495 US gal412 UK gal | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,281 LC/year | 1,339 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W210) Facelift 1999 AMG E 55 V8
- Has 150 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 1.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 23 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
- Has 80 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 CDI
- Is 70 kg lighter
- Uses 7.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 517 km (321 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























