Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33)
Car comparison
Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24VvsMercedes-Benz CLK (A208) · Facelift 1999 CLK 430
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz CLK (A208) · Facelift 1999
CLK 430
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful283 hp211 kW
- Lightest1,635 kg3,605 lb
- Best power-to-weight173 hp/t129 kW/t5.8 kg/hp
- Best performance score61/100
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 CLK 430
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best overall score55/100
- Best economy score74/100
- Best practicality score48/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 430 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 283hp211kW | 279hp208kW |
| Torque | 352Nm260lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,635kg3,605lb | 1,755kg3,869lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,080kg4,586lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 89.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 104.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.4s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.4s Calculated | 27.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 17.7L/100 km13.3mpg US16.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 173hp/t129kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated | 159hp/t119kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated | 228Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 508km316mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,498cc213cu in | 4,266cc260cu in |
| Length | 4,310mm170in | 4,567mm180in |
| Width | 1,815mm71in | 1,722mm68in |
| Height | 1,328mm52in | 1,382mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,650mm104in | 2,690mm106in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,505mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,545mm61in | 1,474mm58in |
| Max trunk volume | 130L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 62L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 CLK 430: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 6,200 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 430 | 5,750 rpm | 3,000-4,400 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 430 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.4 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.4 s | 27.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 100 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 283 hp 211 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 430 | 279 hp 208 kW |
Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V has 4 hp more than Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 CLK 430.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 CLK 430 and Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 352 Nm 260 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 430 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 430 | 1,755 kg 3,869 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 430 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 6.4 s |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 430 | 7.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V and Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 CLK 430: 1.0 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 430 | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 283 hp 211 kW | 6.4 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 430 | 279 hp 208 kW | 7.4 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 430 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 430 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 283 hp 211 kW | 279 hp 208 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 352 Nm 260 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.4 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb | 1,755 kg 3,869 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 508 km 316 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 130 L 4.6 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 CLK 430 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.2 L/100 km19.3 mpg US23.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,830 L483 US gal403 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,203 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V
- Has 4 hp more
- Is 120 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 CLK 430
- Has 48 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























