Mercedes-Benz CLA Shooting Brake (X118) · Facelift 2023
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz CLA Shooting Brake (X118) · Facelift 2023 CLA 250vsSkoda Octavia IV Combi RS 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Octavia IV Combi
RS 2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia IV Combi RS 2.0 TSI
- Most powerful245 hp183 kW
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight153 hp/t114 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range758 km471 mi
- Largest trunk640 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score59/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Mercedes-Benz CLA Shooting Brake (X118) Facelift 2023 CLA 250
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,580 kg3,483 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)Facelift 2023CLA 250 | SkodaOctavia IV CombiRS 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 224hp167kW | 245hp183kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 370Nm273lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,580kg3,483lb | 1,602kg3,532lb |
| Gross weight | 2,175kg4,795lb | 2,070kg4,564lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 71.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 71.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.1s Calculated | 21.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 142hp/t106kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 222Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated | 231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 671km417mi Calculated | 758km471mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,688mm185in | 4,702mm185in |
| Width | 1,830mm72in | 1,829mm72in |
| Height | 1,430mm56in | 1,455mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,729mm107in | 2,681mm106in |
| Front track | 1,614mm64in | 1,541mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,610mm63in | 1,550mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 129mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 485L | 640L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,350L | 1,700L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 151g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz CLA Shooting Brake (X118) Facelift 2023 CLA 250: Power / Torque
- Skoda Octavia IV Combi RS 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)Facelift 2023CLA 250 | 5,500-6,100 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| SkodaOctavia IV CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 5,000-6,500 rpm | 1,600-4,300 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)Facelift 2023CLA 250 | SkodaOctavia IV CombiRS 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.1 s | 21.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 166 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)Facelift 2023CLA 250 | 224 hp 167 kW |
| SkodaOctavia IV CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 245 hp 183 kW |
Skoda Octavia IV Combi RS 2.0 TSI has 21 hp more than Mercedes-Benz CLA Shooting Brake (X118) Facelift 2023 CLA 250.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLA Shooting Brake (X118) Facelift 2023 CLA 250 and Skoda Octavia IV Combi RS 2.0 TSI: 21 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)Facelift 2023CLA 250 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| SkodaOctavia IV CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)Facelift 2023CLA 250 | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb |
| SkodaOctavia IV CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 1,602 kg 3,532 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)Facelift 2023CLA 250 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| SkodaOctavia IV CombiRS 2.0 TSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)Facelift 2023CLA 250 | 6.5 s |
| SkodaOctavia IV CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 6.7 s |
Although Skoda Octavia IV Combi RS 2.0 TSI has more power, Mercedes-Benz CLA Shooting Brake (X118) Facelift 2023 CLA 250 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLA Shooting Brake (X118) Facelift 2023 CLA 250 and Skoda Octavia IV Combi RS 2.0 TSI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)Facelift 2023CLA 250 | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia IV CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Octavia IV Combi RS 2.0 TSI and Mercedes-Benz CLA Shooting Brake (X118) Facelift 2023 CLA 250: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)Facelift 2023CLA 250 | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| SkodaOctavia IV CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)Facelift 2023CLA 250 | 671 km 417 mi |
| SkodaOctavia IV CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 758 km 471 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)Facelift 2023CLA 250 | 224 hp 167 kW | 6.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| SkodaOctavia IV CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)Facelift 2023CLA 250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaOctavia IV CombiRS 2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)Facelift 2023CLA 250 |
| 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaOctavia IV CombiRS 2.0 TSI |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Octavia IV Combi RS 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)Facelift 2023CLA 250 | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| SkodaOctavia IV CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)Facelift 2023CLA 250 | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia IV CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)Facelift 2023CLA 250 | SkodaOctavia IV CombiRS 2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 224 hp 167 kW | 245 hp 183 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb | 1,602 kg 3,532 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 671 km 417 mi | 758 km 471 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 151 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 485 L 17.1 cu ft | 640 L 22.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz CLA Shooting Brake (X118) Facelift 2023 CLA 250 | Skoda Octavia IV Combi RS 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.30 LC100 km | 11.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.40 LC100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,995 LC/year | 1,733 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz CLA Shooting Brake (X118) Facelift 2023 CLA 250
- Is 22 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Skoda Octavia IV Combi RS 2.0 TSI
- Has 21 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 87 km (54 mi) more estimated range
- Has 155 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























