Car comparison

Skoda Octavia IV Combi RS 2.0 TSIvsJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 25t

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Octavia IV Combi

RS 2.0 TSI

245 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedWagon / estate2020-2023
VS

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260)

25t

250 hp1997 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2019-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Octavia IV Combi RS 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    370 Nm
    273 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,602 kg
    3,532 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    153 hp/t
    114 kW/t
    6.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.6 L/100 km
    35.6 mpg US
    42.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.0 L/100 km
    26.1 mpg US
    31.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    151 g/km
  • Best overall score
    69/100
  • Best performance score
    59/100
  • Best economy score
    89/100
  • Best practicality score
    89/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaOctavia IV CombiRS 2.0 TSIJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)25t
Power
245hp183kW
250hp186kW
Torque
370Nm273lb-ft
365Nm269lb-ft
Curb weight
1,602kg3,532lb
1,700kg3,748lb
Gross weight
2,070kg4,564lb
2,290kg5,049lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
241 km/h
150 mph
To 99% top speed
71.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
71.5s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.7s
6.9s
0-200 km/h
21.4s
Calculated
25.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.4s
Calculated
6.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK
9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.6s
Calculated
14.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb
Calculated
147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton
Calculated
215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
758km471mi
Calculated
987km613mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,702mm185in
4,955mm195in
Width
1,829mm72in
1,987mm78in
Height
1,455mm57in
1,496mm59in
Wheelbase
2,681mm106in
2,960mm117in
Front track
1,541mm61in
1,605mm63in
Rear track
1,550mm61in
1,607mm63in
Ground clearance
129mm5in
-
Trunk volume
640L
-
Max trunk volume
1,700L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
74L
CO2 emissions
151g/km
172g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Octavia IV Combi RS 2.0 TSIJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 25tPowerTorque
  • Skoda Octavia IV Combi RS 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 25t: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaOctavia IV CombiRS 2.0 TSI5,000-6,500 rpm1,600-4,300 rpm6,750 rpm
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)25t5,500 rpm1,200-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaOctavia IV CombiRS 2.0 TSIJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)25t
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.4 s
6.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.7 s
6.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
21.4 s
25.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
241 km/h
150 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.8 s
9.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.4 s
12.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.6 s
14.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
166 km/h
103 mph
160 km/h
99 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IV CombiRS 2.0 TSI
245 hp
183 kW
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)25t
250 hp
186 kW

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 25t has 5 hp more than Skoda Octavia IV Combi RS 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia IV Combi RS 2.0 TSI and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 25t: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IV CombiRS 2.0 TSI
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)25t
365 Nm
269 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IV CombiRS 2.0 TSI
1,602 kg
3,532 lb
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)25t
1,700 kg
3,748 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IV CombiRS 2.0 TSI
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)25t
241 km/h
150 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IV CombiRS 2.0 TSI6.7 s
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)25t6.9 s

Although Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 25t has more power, Skoda Octavia IV Combi RS 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia IV Combi RS 2.0 TSI and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 25t: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IV CombiRS 2.0 TSI
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)25t
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Octavia IV Combi RS 2.0 TSI and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 25t: 0.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IV CombiRS 2.0 TSI
153 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)25t
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IV CombiRS 2.0 TSI
758 km
471 mi
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)25t
987 km
613 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaOctavia IV CombiRS 2.0 TSI
245 hp
183 kW
6.7 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)25t
250 hp
186 kW
6.9 s
241 km/h
150 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaOctavia IV CombiRS 2.0 TSI
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
640 L
22.6 cu ft
Length
4,702 mm
185.1 in
Height
1,455 mm
57.3 in
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)25t
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,955 mm
195.1 in
Height
1,496 mm
58.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaOctavia IV CombiRS 2.0 TSI
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)25t
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

Skoda Octavia IV Combi RS 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaOctavia IV CombiRS 2.0 TSI
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
6.7 s
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)25t
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
6.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaOctavia IV CombiRS 2.0 TSI
153 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)25t
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaOctavia IV CombiRS 2.0 TSIJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)25t
Power
245 hp
183 kW
250 hp
186 kW
Torque
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.7 s
6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
241 km/h
150 mph
Lightness
1,602 kg
3,532 lb
1,700 kg
3,748 lb
Fuel consumption
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
640 L
22.6 cu ft
Length
4,702 mm
185.1 in
Height
1,455 mm
57.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,955 mm
195.1 in
Height
1,496 mm
58.9 in
Range score
758 km
471 mi
987 km
613 mi
CO2 score
151 g/km
172 g/km
Trunk score
640 L
22.6 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
153 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Octavia IV Combi RS 2.0 TSIJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 25t
Consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.55 LC100 km13.13 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.59 LC100 mi21.12 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used990 L262 US gal218 UK gal1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,733 LC/year1,969 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Octavia IV Combi RS 2.0 TSI

  • Has 5 Nm more
  • Is 98 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 19 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 21 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 25t

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Has 229 km (142 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Octavia IV Combi RS 2.0 TSI
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 25t
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

RS 2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaOctavia IV CombiRS 2.0 TSIvsCupraLeon Sportstourer2.0 TSI
25t
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)25tvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
RS 2.0 TSI
45 TDI V6
VS
SkodaOctavia IV CombiRS 2.0 TSIvsAUDIA6 Avant (C8)45 TDI V6
25t
25t
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)25tvsJaguarXF (X260)25t
RS 2.0 TSI
45 TDI V6
VS
SkodaOctavia IV CombiRS 2.0 TSIvsAUDIA6 allroad (C8)45 TDI V6
25t
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)25tvsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
25t
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)25tvsJaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8
RS 2.0 TSI
CLA 250
VS
SkodaOctavia IV CombiRS 2.0 TSIvsMercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 250
25t
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)25tvsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
RS 2.0 TSI
330i
VS
SkodaOctavia IV CombiRS 2.0 TSIvsBMW3 Series Touring (G21)330i
25t
2.0 TDI
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)25tvsVolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI
25t
2.0 T5
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)25tvsVolvoV902.0 T5
Skoda Octavia IV Combi RS 2.0 TSI vs Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 25t - car comparison - FastVsFaster