Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) · Facelift 2005
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) · Facelift 2005 AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8vsMercedes-Benz CL (C216) · Facelift 2010 CL 600 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz CL (C216) · Facelift 2010
CL 600 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 CL 600 V12
- Most powerful517 hp386 kW
- Highest torque830 Nm612 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption14.0 L/100 km16.8 mpg US20.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption21.2 L/100 km11.1 mpg US13.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range593 km368 mi
- Largest trunk490 L
- Best economy score69/100
- Best practicality score55/100
Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) Facelift 2005 AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.3 s
- Fastest top speed315 km/h196 mph Unrestricted300 km/h186 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,685 kg3,715 lb
- Best power-to-weight301 hp/t224 kW/t3.3 kg/hp
- Best overall score77/100
- Best performance score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010CL 600 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 507hp378kW | 517hp386kW |
| Torque | 630Nm465lb-ft | 830Nm612lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,685kg3,715lb | 2,110kg4,652lb |
| Gross weight | 1,995kg4,398lb | 2,620kg5,776lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 85.7s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated | 62.2s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.3s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.8s | 16.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.1s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 15.3L/100 km15.4mpg US18.5mpg UK | 14L/100 km16.8mpg US20.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 23.3L/100 km10.1mpg US12.1mpg UK | 21.2L/100 km11.1mpg US13.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.3s Calculated | 12.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 301hp/t224kW/t136hp/1000 lb Calculated | 245hp/t183kW/t111hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 374Nm/t250lb-ft/ton Calculated | 393Nm/t263lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 405km252mi Calculated | 593km368mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,208cc379cu in | 5,513cc336cu in |
| Length | 4,657mm183in | 5,095mm201in |
| Width | 1,833mm72in | 1,871mm74in |
| Height | 1,365mm54in | 1,419mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,715mm107in | 2,955mm116in |
| Front track | - | 1,601mm63in |
| Rear track | - | 1,607mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 127mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 435L | 490L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 83L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) Facelift 2005 AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 CL 600 V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | 6,800 rpm | 5,250 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010CL 600 V12 | 5,000 rpm | 1,800-3,500 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010CL 600 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.1 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.3 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.8 s | 16.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.1 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.4 s | 10.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.3 s | 12.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 189 km/h 117 mph | 181 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | 507 hp 378 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010CL 600 V12 | 517 hp 386 kW |
Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 CL 600 V12 has 10 hp more than Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) Facelift 2005 AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) Facelift 2005 AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 and Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 CL 600 V12: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010CL 600 V12 | 830 Nm 612 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010CL 600 V12 | 2,110 kg 4,652 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010CL 600 V12 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | 4.3 s |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010CL 600 V12 | 4.6 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 CL 600 V12 has more power, Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) Facelift 2005 AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) Facelift 2005 AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 and Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 CL 600 V12: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | 15.3 L/100 km 15.4 mpg US 18.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010CL 600 V12 | 14.0 L/100 km 16.8 mpg US 20.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 CL 600 V12 and Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) Facelift 2005 AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | 301 hp/t 224 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010CL 600 V12 | 245 hp/t 183 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | 405 km 252 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010CL 600 V12 | 593 km 368 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | 507 hp 378 kW | 4.3 s | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010CL 600 V12 | 517 hp 386 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010CL 600 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 |
| 15.3 L/100 km 15.4 mpg US 18.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010CL 600 V12 |
| 14.0 L/100 km 16.8 mpg US 20.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 CL 600 V12 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | 15.3 L/100 km 15.4 mpg US 18.5 mpg UK | 4.3 s |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010CL 600 V12 | 14.0 L/100 km 16.8 mpg US 20.2 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | 301 hp/t 224 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 15.3 L/100 km 15.4 mpg US 18.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010CL 600 V12 | 245 hp/t 183 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 14.0 L/100 km 16.8 mpg US 20.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010CL 600 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 507 hp 378 kW | 517 hp 386 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft | 830 Nm 612 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.3 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb | 2,110 kg 4,652 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 15.3 L/100 km 15.4 mpg US 18.5 mpg UK | 14.0 L/100 km 16.8 mpg US 20.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 405 km 252 mi | 593 km 368 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 435 L 15.4 cu ft | 490 L 17.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 301 hp/t 224 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 245 hp/t 183 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) Facelift 2005 AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 CL 600 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 15.3 L/100 km15.4 mpg US18.5 mpg UK | 14 L/100 km16.8 mpg US20.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 26.78 LC100 km | 24.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 43.09 LC100 mi | 39.43 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,295 L606 US gal505 UK gal | 2,100 L555 US gal462 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,016 LC/year | 3,675 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) Facelift 2005 AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8
- Is 425 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 50 km/h (31 mph) higher top speed
- Has 56 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 CL 600 V12
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 200 Nm more
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 188 km (117 mi) more estimated range
- Has 55 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























