Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) · Facelift 2002
AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 2)
796 hp5980 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2003-2006
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) · Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8 · Stage 2vsMercedes-Benz CL (C215) · Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8 · Stage 3vsMercedes-Benz CL (C215) · Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8 · Stage 1vsMercedes-Benz CL (C215) · Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) · Facelift 2002
AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 3)
918 hp5980 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2003-2006
VS
Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) · Facelift 2002
AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 1)
722 hp5980 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2003-2006
VS
Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) · Facelift 2002
AMG CL 65 V8
612 hp5980 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2003-2006
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 2) 796 hp
- Fastest top speed295 km/h183 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Lightest2,155 kg4,751 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption14.9 L/100 km15.8 mpg US19.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption23.2 L/100 km10.1 mpg US12.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range591 km367 mi
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score89/100
- Best economy score67/100
- Best practicality score54/100
Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 3) 918 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.4 s
- Most powerful918 hp685 kW
- Highest torque1,550 Nm1,143 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight426 hp/t318 kW/t2.3 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 2)796 hp | Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 3)918 hp | Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 1)722 hp | Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8612 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 796hp593kW+184 hp | 918hp685kW+306 hp | 722hp539kW+110 hp | 612hp456kW |
| Torque | 1,350Nm996lb-ft+350 Nm | 1,550Nm1,143lb-ft+550 Nm | 1,220Nm900lb-ft+220 Nm | 1,000Nm738lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,155kg4,751lb | 2,155kg4,751lb | 2,155kg4,751lb | 2,155kg4,751lb |
| Gross weight | 2,530kg5,578lb | 2,530kg5,578lb | 2,530kg5,578lb | 2,530kg5,578lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | 292 km/h 181 mph | 273 km/h 170 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 49.3s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph-6.8 s Calculated | 41.2s99% target: 289 km/h / 180 mph-14.9 s Calculated | 49.3s99% target: 270 km/h / 168 mph-6.8 s Calculated | 56.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.7s-0.7 s | 3.4s-1.0 s | 4.0s-0.4 s | 4.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.0s-3.9 s Calculated | 9.8s-5.1 s Calculated | 12.6s-2.2 s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s-0.6 s Calculated | 3.3s-0.9 s Calculated | 3.8s-0.4 s Calculated | 4.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 23.2L/100 km10.1mpg US12.2mpg UK | 23.2L/100 km10.1mpg US12.2mpg UK | 23.2L/100 km10.1mpg US12.2mpg UK | 23.2L/100 km10.1mpg US12.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.5s-0.9 s Calculated | 11.1s-1.4 s Calculated | 11.9s-0.6 s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 369hp/t275kW/t167hp/1000 lb Calculated | 426hp/t318kW/t193hp/1000 lb Calculated | 335hp/t250kW/t152hp/1000 lb Calculated | 284hp/t212kW/t129hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 626Nm/t419lb-ft/ton Calculated | 719Nm/t481lb-ft/ton Calculated | 566Nm/t379lb-ft/ton Calculated | 464Nm/t310lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 591km367mi Calculated | 591km367mi Calculated | 591km367mi Calculated | 591km367mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,980cc365cu in | 5,980cc365cu in | 5,980cc365cu in | 5,980cc365cu in |
| Length | 4,993mm197in | 4,993mm197in | 4,993mm197in | 4,993mm197in |
| Width | 1,857mm73in | 1,857mm73in | 1,857mm73in | 1,857mm73in |
| Height | 1,398mm55in | 1,398mm55in | 1,398mm55in | 1,398mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,885mm114in | 2,885mm114in | 2,885mm114in | 2,885mm114in |
| Front track | 1,581mm62in | 1,581mm62in | 1,581mm62in | 1,581mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,583mm62in | 1,583mm62in | 1,583mm62in | 1,583mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 450L | 450L | 450L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 88L | 88L | 88L | 88L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 2) 796 hpMercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 3) 918 hpMercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 1) 722 hpMercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8 612 hpPowerTorque
- Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 2) 796 hp: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 3) 918 hp: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 1) 722 hp: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8 612 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 2)796 hp | 4,800 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 5,050 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 3)918 hp | 4,800 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 5,050 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 1)722 hp | 4,800 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 5,050 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8612 hp | 4,800 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 5,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 2)796 hp | Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 3)918 hp | Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 1)722 hp | Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8612 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 3.3 s | 3.8 s | 4.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.7 s | 3.4 s | 4.0 s | 4.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.0 s | 9.8 s | 12.6 s | 14.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | 292 km/h 181 mph | 273 km/h 170 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 1.9 s | 2.0 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 4.9 s | 5.2 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.6 s | 7.3 s | 7.8 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.7 s | 9.4 s | 10.0 s | 10.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.5 s | 11.1 s | 11.9 s | 12.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 205 km/h 127 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph | 195 km/h 121 mph | 185 km/h 115 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 2)796 hp | 796 hp 593 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 3)918 hp | 918 hp 685 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 1)722 hp | 722 hp 539 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8612 hp | 612 hp 456 kW |
Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 3) 918 hp has 306 hp more than Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8 612 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8 612 hp and Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 3) 918 hp: 306 hp (228 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 2)796 hp | 1,350 Nm 996 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 3)918 hp | 1,550 Nm 1,143 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 1)722 hp | 1,220 Nm 900 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8612 hp | 1,000 Nm 738 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 2)796 hp | 2,155 kg 4,751 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 3)918 hp | 2,155 kg 4,751 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 1)722 hp | 2,155 kg 4,751 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8612 hp | 2,155 kg 4,751 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 2)796 hp | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 3)918 hp | 292 km/h 181 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 1)722 hp | 273 km/h 170 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8612 hp | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 3) 918 hp and Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8 612 hp: 1.0 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 2) 796 hp and Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 1) 722 hp, separated by only 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 2)796 hp | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 3)918 hp | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 1)722 hp | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8612 hp | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 2)796 hp | 369 hp/t 275 kW/t 2.7 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 3)918 hp | 426 hp/t 318 kW/t 2.3 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 1)722 hp | 335 hp/t 250 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8612 hp | 284 hp/t 212 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 2)796 hp | 591 km 367 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 3)918 hp | 591 km 367 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 1)722 hp | 591 km 367 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8612 hp | 591 km 367 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 2)796 hp | 796 hp 593 kW | 3.7 s | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 3)918 hp | 918 hp 685 kW | 3.4 s | 292 km/h 181 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 1)722 hp | 722 hp 539 kW | 4.0 s | 273 km/h 170 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8612 hp | 612 hp 456 kW | 4.4 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 2)796 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 3)918 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 1)722 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8612 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 2)796 hp |
| 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 3)918 hp |
| 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 1)722 hp |
| 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8612 hp |
| 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 2) 796 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 2)796 hp | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | 3.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 3)918 hp | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | 3.4 s |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 1)722 hp | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | 4.0 s |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8612 hp | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 2)796 hp | 369 hp/t 275 kW/t 2.7 kg/hp | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 3)918 hp | 426 hp/t 318 kW/t 2.3 kg/hp | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 1)722 hp | 335 hp/t 250 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8612 hp | 284 hp/t 212 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 2)796 hp | Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 3)918 hp | Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 1)722 hp | Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8612 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 796 hp 593 kW | 918 hp 685 kW | 722 hp 539 kW | 612 hp 456 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,350 Nm 996 lb-ft | 1,550 Nm 1,143 lb-ft | 1,220 Nm 900 lb-ft | 1,000 Nm 738 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.7 s | 3.4 s | 4.0 s | 4.4 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | 292 km/h 181 mph | 273 km/h 170 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,155 kg 4,751 lb | 2,155 kg 4,751 lb | 2,155 kg 4,751 lb | 2,155 kg 4,751 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 591 km 367 mi | 591 km 367 mi | 591 km 367 mi | 591 km 367 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 369 hp/t 275 kW/t 2.7 kg/hp | 426 hp/t 318 kW/t 2.3 kg/hp | 335 hp/t 250 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 284 hp/t 212 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 2) 796 hp | Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 3) 918 hp | Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 1) 722 hp | Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8 612 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.9 L/100 km15.8 mpg US19 mpg UK | 14.9 L/100 km15.8 mpg US19 mpg UK | 14.9 L/100 km15.8 mpg US19 mpg UK | 14.9 L/100 km15.8 mpg US19 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 26.08 LC100 km | 26.08 LC100 km | 26.08 LC100 km | 26.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 41.96 LC100 mi | 41.96 LC100 mi | 41.96 LC100 mi | 41.96 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,235 L590 US gal492 UK gal | 2,235 L590 US gal492 UK gal | 2,235 L590 US gal492 UK gal | 2,235 L590 US gal492 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,911 LC/year | 3,911 LC/year | 3,911 LC/year | 3,911 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 2) 796 hp
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8 (Stage 3) 918 hp
- Has 122 hp more
- Has 200 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 57 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) AMG CL 65 V8
Compare selected cars
1 vehicle selected
Popular comparisons
Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8vsMercedes-BenzCL (C216)AMG CL 65 V12
Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8vsMercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12
Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8vsMercedes-BenzCL (C215)AMG CL 63 V12
Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8vsMercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 600 V12
Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8vsMercedes-BenzCLK (C209)AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8
Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8vsMercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)5.5 V8 Kompressor
Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8vsMercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8
Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8vsMercedes-BenzSL Coupe (R230)Facelift 2008AMG SL 65 Black Series V12
Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8vsMercedes-BenzS-class Coupe (C217)AMG S 65 V12
Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8vsMercedes-BenzS-class Coupe (C217)Facelift 2017AMG S 65
Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8vsBMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10
Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8vsMercedes-BenzSLS AMG Coupe (C197)6.2 V8