Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) · Facelift 2026
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) · Facelift 2026 C 250vsVolkswagen Magotan (B9) 380TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Magotan (B9)
380TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Magotan (B9) 380TSI
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,030 km640 mi
- Largest trunk520 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 250
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed248 km/h154 mph
- Lightest1,650 kg3,638 lb
- Best power-to-weight132 hp/t99 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
- Best performance score54/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | VolkswagenMagotan (B9)380TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 218hp163kW | 220hp164kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,650kg3,638lb | 1,684kg3,713lb |
| Gross weight | 2,265kg4,993lb | - |
| Top speed | 248 km/h 154 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 68.9s99% target: 246 km/h / 153 mph Calculated | 62.2s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.9s Calculated | 28.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 132hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 131hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 194Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 957km594mi Calculated | 1,030km640mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,766mm188in | 4,990mm196in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,854mm73in |
| Height | 1,438mm57in | 1,487mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,871mm113in |
| Front track | 1,582mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,594mm63in | - |
| Trunk volume | 455L | 520L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 69L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 250: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Magotan (B9) 380TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | 5,000-6,100 rpm | 1,400-4,000 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| VolkswagenMagotan (B9)380TSI | 4,900-6,700 rpm | 1,600-4,300 rpm | 6,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | VolkswagenMagotan (B9)380TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.9 s | 28.8 s |
| Top speed | 248 km/h 154 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 161 km/h 100 mph | 157 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | 218 hp 163 kW |
| VolkswagenMagotan (B9)380TSI | 220 hp 164 kW |
Volkswagen Magotan (B9) 380TSI has 2 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 250.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 250 and Volkswagen Magotan (B9) 380TSI: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenMagotan (B9)380TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb |
| VolkswagenMagotan (B9)380TSI | 1,684 kg 3,713 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | 248 km/h 154 mph |
| VolkswagenMagotan (B9)380TSI | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | 7.3 s |
| VolkswagenMagotan (B9)380TSI | 7.3 s |
Although Volkswagen Magotan (B9) 380TSI has more power, Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 250 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenMagotan (B9)380TSI | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenMagotan (B9)380TSI | 131 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | 957 km 594 mi |
| VolkswagenMagotan (B9)380TSI | 1,030 km 640 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | 218 hp 163 kW | 7.3 s | 248 km/h 154 mph |
| VolkswagenMagotan (B9)380TSI | 220 hp 164 kW | 7.3 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenMagotan (B9)380TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenMagotan (B9)380TSI |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 250 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| VolkswagenMagotan (B9)380TSI | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenMagotan (B9)380TSI | 131 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | VolkswagenMagotan (B9)380TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 218 hp 163 kW | 220 hp 164 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 248 km/h 154 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb | 1,684 kg 3,713 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 957 km 594 mi | 1,030 km 640 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 131 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 250 | Volkswagen Magotan (B9) 380TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.08 LC100 km | 11.73 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,811 LC/year | 1,759 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 250
- Is 34 kg lighter
- Has 23 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Magotan (B9) 380TSI
- Has 2 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 73 km (46 mi) more estimated range
- Has 65 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























