Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) · Facelift 2026
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) · Facelift 2026 C 250vsMercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W206)
C 200
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 250
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed248 km/h154 mph
- Most powerful218 hp163 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight132 hp/t99 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
- Best estimated range957 km594 mi
- Largest trunk455 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200
- Lightest1,575 kg3,472 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Best economy score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 218hp163kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,650kg3,638lb | 1,575kg3,472lb |
| Gross weight | 2,265kg4,993lb | 2,265kg4,993lb |
| Top speed | 248 km/h 154 mph | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 68.9s99% target: 246 km/h / 153 mph Calculated | 68.1s99% target: 244 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.9s Calculated | 24.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 132hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 194Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated | 190Nm/t127lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 957km594mi Calculated | 758km471mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,496cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,766mm188in | 4,751mm187in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,820mm72in |
| Height | 1,438mm57in | 1,437mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,582mm62in | 1,582mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,594mm63in | 1,594mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | 455L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 50L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 250: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | 5,000-6,100 rpm | 1,400-4,000 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200 | 5,800-6,100 rpm | 1,800-4,000 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.9 s | 24.2 s |
| Top speed | 248 km/h 154 mph | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 161 km/h 100 mph | 161 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | 218 hp 163 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200 | 204 hp 152 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 250 has 14 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 250: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200 | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | 248 km/h 154 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200 | 246 km/h 153 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | 7.3 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200 | 7.3 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200 | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | 957 km 594 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200 | 758 km 471 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | 218 hp 163 kW | 7.3 s | 248 km/h 154 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200 | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.3 s | 246 km/h 153 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200 |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 250 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200 | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 218 hp 163 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 248 km/h 154 mph | 246 km/h 153 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 957 km 594 mi | 758 km 471 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 250 | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.08 LC100 km | 11.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,811 LC/year | 1,733 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 250
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 199 km (124 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200
- Is 75 kg lighter
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























