Mercedes-Benz E-class (W214)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W214) E 180vsMercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 180
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W206)
C 180
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W214) E 180
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Most powerful170 hp127 kW
- Highest torque250 Nm184 lb-ft
- Best estimated range746 km464 mi
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score55/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 180
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.6 s
- Lightest1,550 kg3,417 lb
- Best power-to-weight110 hp/t82 kW/t9.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Best performance score46/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 180 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 170hp127kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,745kg3,847lb | 1,550kg3,417lb |
| Gross weight | 2,445kg5,390lb | 2,250kg4,960lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 82.9s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 75.6s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.9s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.7s Calculated | 31.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.5s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.4s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 97hp/t73kW/t44hp/1000 lb Calculated | 110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 143Nm/t96lb-ft/ton Calculated | 161Nm/t108lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 746km464mi Calculated | 615km382mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,496cc91cu in | 1,496cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,949mm195in | 4,751mm187in |
| Width | 1,880mm74in | 1,820mm72in |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,437mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,961mm117in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,634mm64in | 1,601mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,648mm65in | 1,613mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 455L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 40L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W214) E 180: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 180: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 180 | 5,600-6,100 rpm | 1,800-4,000 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 5,500-6,100 rpm | 1,800-4,000 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 180 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.5 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.9 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.7 s | 31.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 3.0 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.5 s | 7.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 11.0 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 14.0 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.4 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 180 | 170 hp 127 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 170 hp 127 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 180 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 180 | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 1,550 kg 3,417 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 180 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 231 km/h 144 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 180 | 8.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 8.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 180 and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W214) E 180: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 180 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 180 | 97 hp/t 73 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 180 | 746 km 464 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 615 km 382 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 180 | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.9 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.6 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 180 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 180 |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 180 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 180 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 180 | 97 hp/t 73 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 180 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 170 hp 127 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.9 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb | 1,550 kg 3,417 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 746 km 464 mi | 615 km 382 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 97 hp/t 73 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W214) E 180 | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 180 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.73 LC100 km | 11.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,759 LC/year | 1,706 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W214) E 180
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 131 km (81 mi) more estimated range
- Has 85 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 180
- Is 195 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























