Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) · Facelift 2018
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) · Facelift 2018 C 300dvsVolvo S90 2.0 D5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S90
2.0 D5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 300d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.7 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful245 hp183 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lightest1,630 kg3,594 lb
- Best power-to-weight150 hp/t112 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score65/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Volvo S90 2.0 D5
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions144 g/km
- Best estimated range1,091 km678 mi
- Best economy score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300d | VolvoS902.0 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245hp183kW | 235hp175kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 480Nm354lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,630kg3,594lb | 1,953kg4,306lb |
| Gross weight | 2,285kg5,038lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 57.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 71.9s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.7s Calculated | 23.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.7s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 150hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated | 120hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 307Nm/t205lb-ft/ton Calculated | 246Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 719km447mi Calculated | 1,091km678mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,950cc119cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,686mm184in | 4,963mm195in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,879mm74in |
| Height | 1,442mm57in | 1,443mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,840mm112in | 2,941mm116in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,628mm64in |
| Rear track | - | 1,629mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 92mm4in | 152mm6in |
| Trunk volume | - | 500L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 41L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 151g/km | 144g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 300d: Power / Torque
- Volvo S90 2.0 D5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300d | - | 1,600-2,400 rpm | 2,650 rpm |
| VolvoS902.0 D5 | 4,000 rpm | - | 5,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300d | VolvoS902.0 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.4 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.7 s | 23.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.7 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 177 km/h 110 mph | 162 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300d | 245 hp 183 kW |
| VolvoS902.0 D5 | 235 hp 175 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 300d has 10 hp more than Volvo S90 2.0 D5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S90 2.0 D5 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 300d: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300d | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| VolvoS902.0 D5 | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300d | 1,630 kg 3,594 lb |
| VolvoS902.0 D5 | 1,953 kg 4,306 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300d | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS902.0 D5 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300d | 5.7 s |
| VolvoS902.0 D5 | 7.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 300d and Volvo S90 2.0 D5: 1.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300d | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
| VolvoS902.0 D5 | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300d | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
| VolvoS902.0 D5 | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300d | 719 km 447 mi |
| VolvoS902.0 D5 | 1,091 km 678 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300d | 245 hp 183 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS902.0 D5 | 235 hp 175 kW | 7.0 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS902.0 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300d |
| 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS902.0 D5 |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 300d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300d | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
| VolvoS902.0 D5 | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300d | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
| VolvoS902.0 D5 | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300d | VolvoS902.0 D5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp 183 kW | 235 hp 175 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,630 kg 3,594 lb | 1,953 kg 4,306 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 719 km 447 mi | 1,091 km 678 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 151 g/km | 144 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 300d | Volvo S90 2.0 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.98 LC100 km | 9.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.05 LC100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 855 L226 US gal188 UK gal | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,496 LC/year | 1,444 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 300d
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 323 kg lighter
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 30 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo S90 2.0 D5
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 372 km (231 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 7 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























