Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220dvsSeat Exeo · Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Exeo · Facelift 2011
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Fastest top speed233 km/h145 mph
- Most powerful170 hp127 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.9 L/100 km60.3 mpg US72.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions117 g/km
- Largest trunk480 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI
- Lightest1,455 kg3,208 lb
- Best power-to-weight117 hp/t87 kW/t8.6 kg/hp
- Best estimated range1,296 km805 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 170hp127kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,505kg3,318lb | 1,455kg3,208lb |
| Gross weight | 2,135kg4,707lb | 2,015kg4,442lb |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.3s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated | 74.3s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 8.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.2s Calculated | 32.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.9L/100 km60.3mpg US72.4mpg UK | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 113hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 266Nm/t178lb-ft/ton Calculated | 241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 911km566mi Calculated | 1,296km805mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,143cc131cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,686mm184in | 4,661mm184in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,772mm70in |
| Height | 1,442mm57in | 1,430mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,840mm112in | 2,642mm104in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,522mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,570mm62in | 1,523mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 480L | 460L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 833L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 41L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 117g/km | 142g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d: Power / Torque
- Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 3,000-4,200 rpm | 1,400-2,800 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 4,200 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 8.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.2 s | 32.1 s |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 170 hp 127 kW |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 170 hp 127 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 229 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 7.8 s |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 8.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d and Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d and Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 911 km 566 mi |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 1,296 km 805 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 170 hp 127 kW | 7.8 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.4 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d |
| 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 170 hp 127 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 8.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 911 km 566 mi | 1,296 km 805 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 117 g/km | 142 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d | Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.88 LC100 km | 9.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.67 LC100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 675 L178 US gal148 UK gal | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,181 LC/year | 1,418 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 20 L more trunk volume
- Emits 25 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI
- Is 50 kg lighter
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 385 km (239 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























