Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200vsMercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W205)
C 200
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions153 g/km
- Best estimated range735 km457 mi
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Lightest1,470 kg3,241 lb
- Best power-to-weight125 hp/t93 kW/t8.0 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,500kg3,307lb | 1,470kg3,241lb |
| Gross weight | 2,215kg4,883lb | 2,110kg4,652lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.5s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 66.6s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.1s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.3s Calculated | 26.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.7s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 123hp/t91kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated | 204Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 735km457mi Calculated | 569km354mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,991cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,923mm194in | 4,686mm184in |
| Width | 1,852mm73in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,442mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,939mm116in | 2,840mm112in |
| Front track | - | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,619mm64in | 1,570mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 480L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 41L |
| CO2 emissions | 153g/km | 162g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.7 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.1 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.3 s | 26.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 184 hp 137 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 184 hp 137 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 234 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 8.1 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 7.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200 and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 735 km 457 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 569 km 354 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 184 hp 137 kW | 8.1 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.4 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.1 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 735 km 457 mi | 569 km 354 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 153 g/km | 162 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200 | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.90 LC100 km | 12.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,785 LC/year | 1,890 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200
- Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 166 km (103 mi) more estimated range
- Has 60 L more trunk volume
- Emits 9 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200
- Is 30 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























