Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200vsVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 1.6 T4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205)

C 200

184 hp1991 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2015-2016
VS

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013

1.6 T4

180 hp1596 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSedan2013-2015

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    229 km/h
    142 mph
  • Most powerful
    184 hp
    137 kW
  • Highest torque
    300 Nm
    221 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,470 kg
    3,241 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    125 hp/t
    93 kW/t
    8.0 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    480 L
  • Best overall score
    58/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best practicality score
    74/100

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.3 L/100 km
    32.2 mpg US
    38.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.9 L/100 km
    48.0 mpg US
    57.6 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,164 km
    723 mi
  • Best economy score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
Power
184hp137kW
180hp134kW
Torque
300Nm221lb-ft
240Nm177lb-ft
Curb weight
1,470kg3,241lb
1,495kg3,296lb
Gross weight
2,110kg4,652lb
2,020kg4,453lb
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
To 99% top speed
66.3s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
73.4s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.6s
8.3s
0-200 km/h
28.8s
Calculated
33.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.2s
Calculated
7.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.5s
Calculated
16.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
120hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
204Nm/t137lb-ft/ton
Calculated
161Nm/t107lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
631km392mi
Calculated
1,164km723mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,991cc121cu in
1,596cc97cu in
Length
4,686mm184in
4,635mm182in
Width
1,810mm71in
1,865mm73in
Height
1,442mm57in
1,484mm58in
Wheelbase
2,840mm112in
2,776mm109in
Front track
1,588mm63in
1,588mm63in
Rear track
1,570mm62in
1,585mm62in
Ground clearance-
136mm5in
Trunk volume
480L
380L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
41L
68L
CO2 emissions
151g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4PowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200: Power / Torque
  • Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 2005,500 rpm1,200-4,000 rpm5,750 rpm
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T45,700 rpm1,600-5,000 rpm6,150 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.2 s
7.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.6 s
8.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
28.8 s
33.5 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
7.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.1 s
13.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.5 s
16.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
155 km/h
97 mph
150 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200
184 hp
137 kW
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
180 hp
134 kW

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200 has 4 hp more than Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
240 Nm
177 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200
1,470 kg
3,241 lb
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
1,495 kg
3,296 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200
229 km/h
142 mph
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
225 km/h
140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 2007.6 s
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T48.3 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200 and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200: 0.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
120 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200
631 km
392 mi
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
1,164 km
723 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200
184 hp
137 kW
7.6 s
229 km/h
142 mph
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
180 hp
134 kW
8.3 s
225 km/h
140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,686 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,442 mm
56.8 in
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
7.6 s
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
8.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
120 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
Power
184 hp
137 kW
180 hp
134 kW
Torque
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.6 s
8.3 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
Lightness
1,470 kg
3,241 lb
1,495 kg
3,296 lb
Fuel consumption
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,686 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,442 mm
56.8 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
Range score
631 km
392 mi
1,164 km
723 mi
CO2 score
151 g/km
-
Trunk score
480 L
17.0 cu ft
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
120 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4
Consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.38 LC100 km10.15 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.31 LC100 mi16.33 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used975 L258 US gal214 UK gal870 L230 US gal191 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,706 LC/year1,523 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Has 60 Nm more
  • Is 25 kg lighter
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 100 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4

  • Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 533 km (331 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200
Volvo S60 II 1.6 T4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

C 200
C 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200
1.6 T4
2.4 D5
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4vsVolvoS60 II2.4 D5
C 200
C 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d
1.6 T4
2.4i T5 20V
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4vsVolvoS602.4i T5 20V
C 200
C 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 200
1.6 T4
2.0 D4
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4vsVolvoS902.0 D4
C 200
C 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 200
1.6 T4
E 200
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200
C 200
C 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d
1.6 T4
2.2 D-CAT
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4vsToyotaAvensis IIIFacelift 20122.2 D-CAT
C 200
C 350 V6
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004C 350 V6
1.6 T4
2.5 T5
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4vsVolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200 vs Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 1.6 T4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster