Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) · Facelift 2013
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) · Facelift 2013 E 200vsMercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W205)
C 200
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 200
- Fastest top speed233 km/h145 mph
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range967 km601 mi
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Lightest1,470 kg3,241 lb
- Best power-to-weight125 hp/t93 kW/t8.0 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Best performance score50/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,580kg3,483lb | 1,470kg3,241lb |
| Gross weight | 2,210kg4,872lb | 2,110kg4,652lb |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.2s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated | 66.3s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.4s Calculated | 28.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 190Nm/t127lb-ft/ton Calculated | 204Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 967km601mi Calculated | 631km392mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,991cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,879mm192in | 4,686mm184in |
| Width | 1,854mm73in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,474mm58in | 1,442mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,874mm113in | 2,840mm112in |
| Front track | 1,598mm63in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,614mm64in | 1,570mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 480L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 59L | 41L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 151g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 200: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.4 s | 28.8 s |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 95 mph | 155 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200 | 184 hp 137 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 184 hp 137 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200 | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200 | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 229 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200 | 7.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200 and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 200: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200 | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200 | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200 | 967 km 601 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 631 km 392 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.9 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.6 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200 |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200 | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200 | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 967 km 601 mi | 631 km 392 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 151 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 200 | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.67 LC100 km | 11.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,601 LC/year | 1,706 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 200
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 336 km (209 mi) more estimated range
- Has 60 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200
- Is 110 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























